Force Closure

closure, huh?

Next_states is a called to closure. You implemented closure.

Give them closure.

To help bring me some closure.

This could provide closure for your father.

But now I'm going to bring in the closure, and we decided to perform the closure in state 1 .

One is by calling the closure or predicting.

now, take a personal day. get some closure.

We only wanted to compute this closure on E.

You have traveled an awful long way for closure.

... left without any sense of closure. I don't know.

It gives us some kind of closure at least.

Then we brought in these other two from the closure.

When we're computing the closure there's nothing before the red dot.

If it is, we bring in the closure, and that's it.

Perhaps we feel that many of our relationships have not had closure.

Well, what's the thing I'm supposed to be bringing in the closure for?

And this one correctly has from2. We computed the closure in chart 2 .

More than that, begin a healing process and finally to as an act of closure to a terrible period in this country's history.

When we're computing the closure, we add more information to the current chart state.

We have the procedure closure that you wrote, once again defined using list comprehension.

If the current state is a ab dot cd, we could compute the closure.

Now I have to demean myself with Ralph just to get closure with you.

We can only hope that identification will provide closure to the families of the victims.

In addition to the closure, there is also the possibility that we're going to do shifting.

We need to know which state we were in when we decided to take the closure.

Again, the from2 is because we brought in or we computed the closure, starting in state 2 .

We compute the closure by looking at all the rules that start with (c) in the grammar.

Another quiz about parsing charts, although the hint for this one is to think about the closure.

And some sociologists actually feel that it's a closure, it's a cocooning, that we're disengaging from the public.

Remember when one is computing the closure, you look for the red dot right in front of a nonterminal light key.

So if you're just here to, I don't know, find closure... then I can tell you what I learned a long time ago.

We haven't seen any of the input yet, and this red dot is not before a nonterminal so there's no closure operations to do.

Why don't you tell me which of these parse states are going to be brought in by chart state 2 , by computing the closure?

It's going to turn out that we'll be able to compute this, fairly systematically, just by remembering the rule for how to compute the closure.

So we just saw Computing the Closure, which is one way to help us complete the parsing chart in fact, it's one of three ways.

If I've computed the closure in the past, and now we've seen enough of the input to actually use a reduction rule, it's as if I put an (E) in the input and we're going to shift right over it.

And in fact, that's where we got this state that's why it says from B we brought it in in chart state B , based on doing the closure here.

As (lovely as) rubies and as (beautiful as) coral.

If the dot is right before a nonterminal, then we take the closure or predict what's going to happen, by bringing in and rewriting rules that start with a (c).

Over and over again we're going to consider additional characters in the input and keep using your three procedures of closure, shifting, and reduction until there aren't any more changes.

Tale as old as time Song as old as rhyme

Food is as important as energy, as security, as the environment.

As light as a feather, and as hard as dragon scales.