So his displacement ... The displacement was 5 kilometers ...

So that is displacement.

Skin displacement another big deal.

These are the displacement maps here.

It's called Earth crust displacement theory

Displacement is just distance with some direction.

So times the magnitude of the displacement.

The next phase it hit was displacement.

So velocity is your displacement over time.

So what was the displacement over here?

In 1958 Professor Charles earth crust displacement

So you can say its displacement ... ... and the letter for displacement is s ... ... and that its a vector quantity.

Anterior or posterior displacement is positive for instability.

Anterior or posterior displacement is positive for instability.

So let's say the displacement, that's the displacement vector right there, and the magnitude of it is equal to 5 meters.

Now, in the vertical case, there would be displacement.

And here you use displacement and you use velocity.

Displacement is not the way to deal with environmental issues.

Text Between Two Fires Torture and Displacement in Northern Uganda

And suppose my displacement x2 minus x1 is exactly 1 millimeters.

leafing through a book and butterflies, imagine such displacement, such loss?

The temporal displacement occurred exactly 1 20 a.m. and zero seconds!

This is the amount of my force in the direction of the displacement, the cosine of the angle between them, times the magnitude of the displacement.

It's the dot product of the force and our super small displacement.

And you might be wondering ... ... why dont they use d for displacement?

So, his velocity ... is ... ... his displacement was 5 kilometers to the north ...

leads to a 2mm displacement for a stereo rig, with focal length 40mm.

Well, by the same exact logic that we did with the simple problem, it's the magnitude of the force in the direction of our displacement times the magnitude of our displacement.

Times the magnitude of the displacement, or you could say, times the distance displaced.

Suppose we have a displacement of 0.05 mm for a focal length of 50.

Next we have a displacement of 0.1 mm. We don't know our focal length.

Observe for evidence of finger malrotation, which can be seen with displacement carpal fractures.

So that's equal to the dot product of our force and our super small displacement.

Distance is the scalar ... ... but if they give the direction too you get the displacement.

You have to find the magnitude of the component going in the same direction as my displacement.

Finally we don't know the displacement, but we do know that the focal length is 200 mm.

And that's so that the d s don't get confused ... ... and thats why we use s for displacement.

Well we can think about it two ways 1) We know that velocity is equal to displacement over change in time and displacement is just change in position so this is change in position over change in time or 2) another way to think about it, if you multiply both sides by change in time you get velocity times change in time, is equal to displacement

For example, if we get far away enough from an object, its displacement map may add very little detail.

Suppose the measured delta x is 4 mm with a focal length of 40, and our displacement is 0.1.

So this magnitude, the magnitude of the force going in the same direction of the displacement in this case, is 5 newtons.

Displacement maps help in particular by giving a more realistic silhouette to an object. At a distance, these fine details are less important.

For a valid calibrated stereo rig, we're given two pinhole cameras whose displacement is B, and we observe a point out in the scene.

For the sake of this question, we're going to just consider delta x, which is x2 minus x1 the displacement in the corresponding images.

I could write that speed ... ... and I'll write out the words, so you don't get confused with displacement ... ... or maybe I will write rate.