Linkage, dunham.

Flux

Half flux.

Flux coupler.

When the linkage parts, it's...

The flux capacitor.

The flux capacitor.

What is the flux capaciter?

We're in the flux vortex.

No sir, it's the flux.

Our observations have a flux limit.

Time circuit's on. Flux capacitor, fluxing.

Can we compensate for the flux?

I've isolated the reverse power flux coupling.

Economic conditions are in a state of flux.

Astrogator to crew. Stand by to change flux.

Besides, the stainlesssteel construction made the flux dispersal

This is the linkage we're making between the lexer and the parser.

See the flux vortex and these full color images?

This is group leader, we're entering the flux vortex.

The flux of its lava cleared all in its path.

And because its a log, its a relative measure of flux relative to some unit flux. In log that comes as a additive constant.

From an engineering point of view, this is just a little four bar linkage.

It's not the spring. It's the linkage from the pedal to the carb. See?

So when the linkage parted, it went the other way. Up instead of down.

Usually just backing off on the gas pedal causes it to upshift if the automatic linkage doesn't.

It's a pretty harrowing linkage between what's happening to our environment and what's happening to our human rights.

The stuff that things are made of is always in flux it's always changing.

Your encounter with the Surfer put your molecules in a constant state of flux.

The minus sign tells you that the higher the number, means the lower the flux.

Navigation just went offline. It's the particle flux in the nebula, it's overloading the sensors.

To loosen the lock ring and nut assembly that holds the linkage rods together a special tool would be needed.

Astronomers use magnitudes which are a logarithmic measure of flux defined by the formula written here.

That's when you got the idea for the flux capacitor which is what makes time travel possible.

If we could somehow harness this lightning channel it into the flux capacitor it just might work.

And discovered some of them are actually quite far away, implying that given the observe flux internal power

But in practice what we do a differential counts, how many per unit flux or other per unit magnitude.

Meanwhile, we've outfitted the time vehicle with this big pole and hook which runs directly into the flux capacitor.

Thus, the number will scale as a flux to 3 2 power, and that is what we call Euclidean source counts.

If for some reason you could integrate the flux over the entire spectrum, then this would be called the bolometric magnitude.

Thankfully, the flux, in other words, the flow of emissions from the ocean to the atmosphere and vice versa, is more or less balanced.

That is if we can measure the total luminosity, but, we usually measure specific flux, which is power per unit wavelength or unit frequency.

And so if we had a universe populated uniformly with some sort of test particles, say, galaxies, and if we can count them as a function of redshift, or alternatively, as a function of flux, because flux would get dimmer with redshift, then we could constrain the models in which we are.

There, in classical rendering, we compare magnitudes, which, remember, are inversely proprotional to the log of the flux, so a higher magnitude means further away, versus redshift.

So in simple, Euclidean, non relativistic universe, the flux would be luminosity divide, divided by the area of the sphere with a radius from here to there.