like a blast furnace.

like a blast furnace.

70millimeter tube furnace. Excellent.

It's not good stuff, and it's from inefficient combustion, not from combustion itself.

Oxygen is needed for combustion.

An old furnace, I think.

Nay, verily it is a furnace

The internal combustion engine is not sustainable.

No, in truth, it is a Furnace!

It's like a furnace in there now.

Probably because no one lit the furnace.

Spontaneous human combustion is rare and scientifically unexplainable.

Any common denominators in cases of spontaneous combustion?

I can melt the shards in the furnace.

Perhaps you'd like to visit my fiery furnace!

So this is our internal combustion engine for creativity.

for with Us there are fetters, and a furnace,

and the libertines shall be in a fiery furnace

What about the internal combustion engine, which was invented in 1879?

Verily We shall have fetters with Us, and a roaring furnace,

But the wicked, indeed they shall be in the Fiery Furnace,

This place can become a furnace if that wind shifts. ( coughs )

They said, 'Build him a building, and cast him into the furnace!'

That fever, man, her skin gave off a heat like a furnace.

Pollutants like this derive mainly from the combustion of fuel in car engines.

They said, Build a pyre for him, and throw him into the furnace.

They said, Build him a furnace, and throw him into the blazing fire!

Carbon monoxide is a poisonous substance formed by the incomplete combustion of carbon compounds.

The internal combustion engine took off because weight mattered, because you were moving around.

As a matter of fact, I invented the combustion engine and the twoway nappy.

They said, Construct for him a furnace and throw him into the burning fire.

They said Build for him a furnace, then cast him into the burning fire.

Now the furnace has fired you red, your soft hardness yields to the hammer.

From playing with it, they learn some basic principles about fire, about intake, combustion, exhaust.

I like to call furnace dumping, which is, quite simply, if you have a building that doesn't need to be heated with a furnace, you save a whole bunch of money up front.

They spoke among themselves Build him a pyre and then throw him into the furnace.

Atmospheric explosions, or full combustion, takes about 15,000 times longer than what happens in your car.

They said, Construct a building (furnace) for him, and then cast him in the blazing fire!

If you put that same fuel in an internal combustion engine car, you get about 20 percent efficiency.

There have been hundreds of millions of internal combustion engines built, compared to thousands of Stirling engines built.

No furnace is fiery enough to melt them, no hammer of mine is hard enough to forge them.

We're going to make phenylacetone in a tube furnace, then we're gonna use reductive amination to yield methamphetamine, 4 pounds.

But after the Stirling engine, Otto came along, and also, he didn't invent the internal combustion engine, he just refined it.

So it's the same idea as a jet engine, it's just the heat source was the reactor rather than the combustion of fuel.

Anybody who's trying to sell you biofuels, or this kind of thing, what do you do about the thermodynamic inefficiency of combustion engines?