The same is true for the negation of A over here.

The second thing we learned has to do with negation of probabilities.

We'll just show the value to max, and the value to min will be the negation of that.

We feed our political impotence by allowing ourselves to call democracy something that is the very negation of our rights.

If the number that's passed in is negative, we take its opposite and we use its negation, and then we return.

Now what happens is the only way that we can 3 color this is if each variable is given a blue for either the variable and black for its negation or black for the variable and blue for the negation and that's like a truth assignment.

For translation, we start with our translation values over here. The inverse is the negation of all those translation values. Which makes sense.

But because we negate the second expression and with this expression, the negation over here is just the opposite false, true, false, false.

If the number is positive, this test will be False so we don't execute the block that changes the value of x to its negation.

So, there's the probability of no cancer, probability of negative, which is negation of positive, given C, and probability of negative positive given not C.

So congratulations, you've implemented the very first example of probability where the event probability is 0.1 and the complementary event and negation of it is encapsulated in this function over here.

There's a double arrow for equivalent, also known as a biconditional, and a not sign for negation, so we could say if we wanted to that John calls if and only if Mary calls.

It's just that form that I showed you before where the formula is the n of a bunch of clauses and each clause is the or of three literals and each literal is either variable or its negation, not the variable, so you walk up to me with 3 CNF problem,