You get one of these ballot forms at random, and then you go into the voting booth, and you mark your choices, and you tear along a perforation.

When you come back out, you get to drop your vote into the ballot box where it mixes with all the other votes, so that no one knows how you voted.

No, I'm voting for your man Gray.

Vioxx, weapons of mass destruction, hanging chads.

It looks something like this.

We'll find out if you can be elected.

And so there's nothing in the software that enforces the rules.

And this other amount is computed through this hot function, and that hot function looks something like this.

And that's the tough part.

And the bit that remains, the one with your marks this is your encrypted vote.

And the big picture is this elections should be verifiable.

Unlike the Internet the ITU was not build on open discussion among scientists and engineers.

Let me demonstrate how to vote.

And you didn't even vote.

OK, that's another vote called for.

That makes it 84, Linus, and 83, Russell.

Okay. So, there's like another little replica that is only read for dumps.

So we can let computers do all the complicated cryptography for us, and then we'll use the paper for verification.

The NSC executive proposes a vote on the following motion

I'll show you how that works. So we've got a table a link table that looks something a lot like what we've been dealing with.

Cooking with Dog is nominated for YouTube Video Awards Japan 2011!

If this is the case, the very large margins secured by the losing candidate in the other states would add up to over 50 of the ballots cast nationally.

And this time even a greater number, 83 percent of the people, voted with blank ballots.

So all of these electors are the ones that are going to go to the state capital in December and decide who they want to plege their vote for so even if Obama won just the second congressional district that's not how it's thought about in the electoral college, it's just a state wide election.

It's got an ID.

One of the government's tactics was to make it difficult for people to work out where to vote and where to register to vote.

And they had traveled from near, they had traveled from far, because they wanted to make their voices heard.

It's a floating point field. And this is the total score of the link.

I call for another vote.

Gibbard and Satterthwaite showed that for any kind of reasonable voting mechanism it's going to be susceptible to manipulation.

I've decided not to give my support to that intervention in Mali.

This column here, votes, this column is also an integer.

So somebody can trick my browser into making a request to another site as me.

Now say, Yes.

Let's vote on it.

In November, we have a chance to vote for life and liberty, not dependency.

Who did you vote for in the election?

We didn't have any comments for a long while, and the links and votes tables were basically kind of as I represented them in this lecture.

I didn't, Your Honour. I voted for ... well ...

Because we asked this question, Why Tuesday? there is now this bill, the Weekend Voting Act in the Congress of the United States of America.

Your vote was successful.

Voting failed.

The database had a fairly guessable structure.

In the event of a tie, the President will cast the deciding vote. Citizens!

I won't be able to tell from the bit remaining what your vote is for.