We have increased our attendance, our pupil attendance, 3 00every single pupil month, as compared to the previous year, 3 04so created an environment, I think, of less problems in the classroom 3 09and in the school in terms of behavior, 3 11and a sense of students wanting to be at school.

This is being answered using Bayes rule, so this is the probability of being happy given that it rains times the probability that it rains over the probability of being happy.

Now, this statement is not true.

And we can denote that by the probability that we get a Result state, S prime given that we start in state, S, and apply action, A.

It is a cost effective approach.

And it makes much more sense to talk about the probability or random variable equaling a value, or the probability that it is less than or greater than something or the probability that is has some property

But we don't know for sure that they're exclusive events.

And two dollars profit per entrepreneur per day, which is like 700 dollars per year. And of course, it's very beneficial in a lot of ways.

We now apply Bayes rule.

Scientists have calculated the odds of you being born.

So we divide by the total weight of all particles, and we get out those probabilities over here.

So, we actually just learned some interesting lessons.

It's our tendency to overestimate our likelihood of experiencing good events in our lives and underestimate our likelihood of experiencing bad events.

There's a 0.1 chance I might still be grumpy for some other reason.

On the second state we know that the probability of R is 0.6 and therefore, the probability of sun is 0.4, and we compute the probability of rain on day 2 using total probability.

From that you can easily calculate the probability of measuring 'white', if a particle falls on a black square.

That is not the case for song.

Let's use the Laplacian smoother with K 1 to calculate the few interesting probabilities

When you receive, say, a positive test result, what you do is, you take your prior P(C) you multiply in the probability of this test result, given C, and you multiply in the probability of the test result given (Neg_BAR_ C).

But for other tumors and cancer types, the improvements have only been modest.

To change this example even further.

Ms. Dewey's a teacher in a Texas elementary school.

So this bond becomes a Double A bond.

I want to introduce the, the idea of probability here just, just in a very, very basic way.

So, I think that in the Industrial Economy time Smith was more correct than Marx.

For example, if we take the action go east into this state over here, with P probability we find ourselves over there.

So go, Level Up, learn new things!

And the answer is 0.0079.

I believe there are three really big changes we need to bring about.

Then I just normalize.

Now, these types of models have different properties.

Yet, this case is only 1 3 likely, because it's only 1 3 likely that the car is behind door number 3.

And then the utility of the game is the expected value, so we look at all the outcomes and the probability of each outcome.

All of those expressions over here can be found either in the table up there or just by their complements, with the exception of P of X1.

You learned about probability of an event, such as the outcome of a coin flip.

We could sum out or marginalize over the variable R to give us a table that just operates on T.

This guy over here is 0.4 again, but now it's this 0.4 over here.

You remember our Markov model where the world was divided into discrete grids, and we assigned to each grid a certain probability.

The reason why that is the case is it relates to the 0.9 probability of speaking the truth.

We know that P of At is P of At given At minus 1 times P of At minus 1 plus P of At given Bt minus 1 times probability of Bt minus 1.

Any probability of X2 being in a certain state must have come from another state, X1, and then transitioned into X2, so we sum over all of those and we get the posterior probability of X2.

In this case, there's only one such variable, Cloudy.

This can be resolved as follows.

I thought it would be an opportunity for you to improve your French.

So the probability that a point that we select from this larger circle is also in the smaller circle is really just a percentage of the larger circle that is the smaller circle so our probability...