February the first, and these the conclusion in both of these papers, and in also the Science editor's, like, descriptions of these papers, for, you know, for the quickie, is that our theories about global warming are completely wrong.

And this might look all complicated to you right now, but I'm showing you the rationale.

Is my paper looked over before submitting?

Written in plain style, as it is, his paper is easy to read.

It is beyond the scope of this paper to argue the input theory in detail.

It arises in the skin.

His paper is superior to mine.

His paper is better than mine.

His essay is better than mine.

But moving into work and we have each week what's called a journal club, when you'd sit down with the other doctors and you'd study a scientific paper in relation to medicine.

The student submitted a paper to an English language journal, and the result was conditional acceptance .

So, literally, a few minutes before that,

Because a valid conclusion so once again, here they're giving us a statement and they want us to come to some conclusion.

His paper is superior to mine.

His paper is better than mine.

His essay is better than mine.

Emmet's theory appears repeatedly in these papers.

And then finally, we have this 1, which is sitting in the ten thousands place, so it literally represents 1 ten thousand.

I spoke at conferences,

The paper discusses the problem in terms of ethics.

So the theory's kaput it's nothing.

The purpose of a conclusion is to sum up the main points of the essay.

And they took a big sample of 10 , 928 articles.

It was also people's deep longing for freedom.

Charles Darwin said,

It's just been published in the British Journal of Educational Technology.

And those two papers came out in Science Magazine,

From your thesis.

For more info on this, Don Knuth, the computer scientist has written an essay on the complexity of songs.

The thesis is finished except for the conclusion.

Nevena Markova, spent about 20 years studying these profiles.

There are many different models that have been proposed.

Surveillance was really interesting.

They can indict your ass. They can debate it.

And that discussion can actually get quite involved.

And he told me that when he and Professor

Then I really started becoming a scientist.

It's an innate thing called goal dilution.

So you go and find this paper, and what you find is it is a real piece of science.

And back even two or three years ago, when people used to make this argument.

All right let's wrap this up.

When people talk about Yugoslav,

His thesis leaves nothing to be desired.

Have you finished writing your thesis?

I turned in my paper yesterday.