This is reasonable.

You could do it that way.

If you're under 50 we want you to work four more years.

If x equals 5, x plus 4 is 9, and this dimension right here is going to be 5.

The fact is it's that uncertain part that should move us towards this.

If I'm going to get an 8 return on my money, that's my benefit, it makes sense for me to borrow it at 5 .

So I'm going to solve this integral for you intuitively, and I think it'll make some sense.

like steal it and so on.

Mother Theresa, she was rational.

Well, you're acting that way.

This idea is not rational.

Tough, yet rational and ethical.

Either way.

There must be a rational explanation for this.

Irrational.

And let's say it's 0 everywhere else.

Yes, you're right.

With no doubt in your mind?

And Alice and Bob both understand what's going on.

You know, what if people are rational?

They actually tend to go a little risky.

And, again, it's because of an alignment of the incentives.

It's not about the things that it brings.

So in this case maybe at least five or six years.

The chance that she was innocent was one in 73 million.

So the Laplace transform of our delta function is 1, which is a nice clean thing to find out.

For once, your incentives are aligned.

But you can have another party.

The whole business it's unreasonable from beginning to end. Quite reasonable, said the Invisible Man.

It has to be. It's the only possible explanation.

It isn't fair.

Think about this, ever rationality is grounded in a leap of intuition.

So this notion of loss aversion kicks in when it comes to savings too, because people, mentally and emotionally and intuitively frame savings as a loss because I have to cut my spending.

His argument is rational.

Terrorists, they're rational.

So p is equal to 1,200.

There are as many different ways of being rational as there are human beings on the planet, and that's one of the glories of human existence.

They can say yes or no to the invention.

(Finebros) Is there anything in American culture that you think would be looked at as completely bizarre to the Japanese? No. America's awesome.

There's gotta be a rational explanation.

We never see in the universe, a cylindrical object, or any other shape.

A rational universe. Explained through rational means.

We're just saying x minus 1 over x plus 2 is just straight up greater than 0.

It's legit.

I want to make a case.