I'm going to show you a trick in a second, so if you fail to do this don't worry.

If they're exposed, they'll be executed.

And all the people and I think there's a lot of people at TED who do things because even though there's not an immediate return on the investment because it will only really pay off when everybody else has done it they'll do it because they're the sort of person who just does things which would be good if everybody else did them.

Therefore, if you can reproduce the input, you can also reproduce the execution.

But we can't move the Earth, at least not easily, but we can move a small asteroid.

We run the whole thing, and now with every line the file name should be opened, line should be read, and the one, single executed line should be printed.

You must never be afraid to rock the boat.

Since the result of passing some text without HTML markup is actually correct, we could now deduce that maybe we should come up with tests that check for these lines which we haven't covered yet, and see whether these fail, and then we could find out that errors would actually be related to the execution of these lines.

And who is providing the means for the General to achieve this?

We write our code up here, when we click run... ... it will run the code, we'll see the output.

Filters are considered one after the other, starting with the first filter in the list. The first one whose pattern matches the given message gets executed you can request that the remaining filters also be applied, but the default is to stop processing at the first matching filter.

But it learns about the reward function, R, and maybe the transition function, P, if it didn't already know that.

Eleven plus one hundred ten is one hundred twenty one.

Run it through from the top.

I feel like Ha Ni will be sad alone too.

I could run them over.

Now let's see what this looks like for foo with markup.

Suppose you put a fixed value over in here, like 12 in this case.

They'd be doing everything that we had taught them.

In testing, you'd like to come up with tests that cover as many execution features as possible.

If not we fail, there can be no solution.

Of course, I had no hair and no immune system.

This data is then sent to another laptop that is running estimation and control algorithms, which in turn sends commands to the quad, which is also running estimation and control algorithms.

We've defined sum_list.

Often this is some event that happened a key press, a timer fires off, something like that.

The only way out of poverty is through business enterprise.

With this formula, we get this kind of code over here and we return the corresponding x value.

Most of us now that the Me Decade is well in the past now we actually do this.

And this is precisely this line, namely, quote not quote.

That is, the same thing as before but now enclosed in double quotes.

And again, it comes up with a number of interesting inputs.

The prospect of using the genome as a universal diagnostic is upon us today.

Although the parse tree for this JavaScript is finite, interpreting it is infinite.

Suppose we run a particle filter with N equals 1 particle. What will happen?

And there's a really wonderful experiment that was done that suggests that we really should go ahead and do this.

The tool changer on this VF 2SS needs to be recovered

That's a shortcut to save this. and then I'll try to run this program.

Let me illustrate how the Phi coefficient is computed on a simple example.

You can't change the captain's policy.

and then you want to print it out.

Now we set the text content of that p tag to this bit here and we set the ID attribute to notify.

I'm going to do this problem thinking out loud.

So it's not going to execute this.

So the example of the bank we've been studying, we're actually kind of doing it in real time.

'What IS the fun?' said Alice. 'Why, SHE,' said the Gryphon.