Now imagine if I tell you, all those who are standing,

But anyway, don't want to get too complicated.

Because there's 6 exams in the class.

Obviously your rent doesn't increase every month, but I assume it does fairly continuously.

It is open .. it is open to subjectivity, and a lot of that subjectivity is all around the assumptions that you choose to make.

We want the procedure to work on any list, so we shouldn't assume anything about the list that was passed in.

And then what's the derivative of y squared with respect to x?

We, will assume there's no correlation between x and y.

I just crossed multiplied.

Let me illustrate how the Phi coefficient is computed on a simple example.

A very simliar to it, is so called expanding photosphere method for supernova.

And then, if n is equal to xr, what's n approaching infinity is the same thing, assuming that r is constant, that's the same thing as x approaching infinity.

There really is no correct answer.

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.

Suddenly, it's not so hypothetical, is it?

But the fact remains that I saw I certainly saw right down his sleeve But did you are you sure?

That's one hell of an assumption.

Because it is a little bit of a game.

When you multiply 8,500 together twice, you get about 73 million.

Property tax, same thing.

Let's suppose it's true.

Again, what do you think could help us get the right answer this time?

Aren't these scaling patterns just universal to all indigenous architecture?

We are in replay mode, however.

And what I want to do

But they don't realize that they made some assumptions.

And in the previous videos, the constants all merged together.

One approach that I'll describe here is

Then I assume you have the location.

Because that's when, on average, people tend to move or refinance.

But anyway, the bankruptcy court will take hold of you.

What we're going to imagine now is that someone has given us matrix.

The regulation was abolished, but then it was reenacted.

So, what's the proof?

The one on the right has the same hotter density, suppose we got that right, but suppose there was no dark energy, and you can see that it fails.

If I change my hypothesis to 201 and one will test again, we now get a true as a result of this test.

It is something amazing. It is the best thing, you know.

I'm trying to draw George Washington.

There were other complicated shape.

liabilities here would have also been the deposits of the people who keep their money at the bank.

Olivia, this isn't like before.

From what I've seen so far, I am forming a hypothesis.

And actually especially after a big real estate boom, may be prudent.

We were not going to leave until the peace accord was signed.

Or maybe I'm really risk averse, and I put it in government bonds, and I get 4 a year.