So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

But with Africa, let's start being careful about this.

I had him in that discussion.

His argument is more radical than yours.

One is why do we argue? Who benefits from arguments?

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

I argued with him about it.

This magenta distance minus this light blue distance.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

Mega doses of vitamin C and complete danger avoidance?

Well, there are some other puzzles.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

They argued outside the Pig 'n Whistle.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.

It is no use arguing with him about it.

And with screenings on the Hill, and discussions, and with our social sector partners,

I'm not accustomed to discussion.

It is no use arguing with him about it.

This has been confirmed by many, many subsequent observations now we know more of these galaxies.

I have a couple of ideas to begin with.

I've heard that argument before.

Because of the oil, everybody talked about the polilution.

Well, now we got some discussing to do. Right here and now.

Every once in a while, I hop on and stir the pot to get a good debate going.

Think about that one have you ever entered an argument thinking,

She argues for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.

Then we have what I believe are the ideas in conflict.

You had a new idea Flattr.

At the meeting he monopolized the discussion and completely disrupted the proceeding.

That's not a very helpful model for arguing, but it's a pretty common and entrenched model for arguing.

How does it apply over here? And you answer my question.

We'll talk about a learning algorithm

Because I have nothing to hide.

The matter is not open for debate.

Discuss.

What is the basis for the argument?

And I'm not just an academic, I'm a philosopher, so I like to think that I'm actually pretty good at arguing.