And if I'm running find all, I'd rather have it return the hyphenated word super irvin instead of first checking if the word matches just super, then seeing that hyphen doesn't match anything, and then returning irvin.

One match.

Here if we're looking for single letter strings that are between 0 and 9, the 1 matches, the plus does not, the 2 matches, the equals does not, the equals does not, and the 3 matches.

We found her prints in her fianc's blood on the murder weapon.

We found her prints and her fiancés blood on the murder weapon.

So effectively, we are saying that our number of images loaded equal to number of images that exist.

Yeah, okay.

Visual matching.

There's a coincidence

Consistency!

We match perfectly so far.

She calls it, get this, a quiche .

Nobody's gonna change his vote.

No, that that's a coincidence.

No matter what they do They just still get through

Maybe this is just a coincidence.

It's a perfect match.

It's not going to be the string 1 because the maximal munch rule means that we're not going to match just one.

It's a collection of letters, and it may have underscores, but it doesn't.

We're looking for single letter strings, 0 through 9, in Mir Taqi 1723 nothing, nothing, yes, yes, yes, yes.

Exact Match

MD5 Sums Equal

Substring Match

Match Beginning

Match Anywhere

is

Is Exactly the Same As

File Format Mismatch

Passwords Do Not Match

Strangely enough,

I say we take it in to the judge. How about it?

I'm ready to walk into court and declare a hung jury. There's no point in this thing going on.

Um, one matched the office manager.

The strands of hair under her nails positively are those of her husband, the defendant, Richard Kimble.

No. Nobody's got it.

I only want to do this if cd is not empty and if this E, which was rule 0, matches the first part of cd.

Great.

I agree.

is

MD5 Sums Differ

Velocity matching

Exact Match

is not

File Format Mismatch

An identification?