His paper is superior to mine.

His paper is better than mine.

His essay is better than mine.

His paper is superior to mine.

His paper is better than mine.

His essay is better than mine.

His paper reads like a novel.

Charles Darwin said,

This scientific article reads like a novel.

(Laughter)

In harmony with the raccoons, as it said in the papers.

I spoke at conferences,

And those two papers came out in Science Magazine,

From your thesis.

The student submitted a paper to an English language journal, and the result was conditional acceptance .

What about other countries?

I know the chap that started the lie. There ain't no Invisible Man whatsoever

So you go and find this paper, and what you find is it is a real piece of science.

The one on the left is mine, okay? (Laughter)

And so what Dave Sifry at Technorati started working on,

Emmet's theory appears repeatedly in these papers.

His paper is superior to mine.

His paper is better than mine.

His essay is better than mine.

A peer review day, and our goal by the end of class is for you to be able to determine whether or not you have moves to prove in your essays.

Excuse me, sir. I need you to sign off on my master's thesis.

The purpose of a conclusion is to sum up the main points of the essay.

And he told me that when he and Professor

The thesis is finished except for the conclusion.

It is beyond the scope of this paper to argue the input theory in detail.

Given the optical, signs of something interesting were already there.

It was also people's deep longing for freedom.

So I started studying anthropology.

Because a valid conclusion so once again, here they're giving us a statement and they want us to come to some conclusion.

I am of course quoting from a famous essay by Leonard Read, the economist in the 1950s, called I, Pencil in which he wrote about how a pencil came to be made, and how nobody knows even how to make a pencil, because the people who assemble it don't know how to mine graphite, and they don't know how to fell trees and that kind of thing.

February the first, and these the conclusion in both of these papers, and in also the Science editor's, like, descriptions of these papers, for, you know, for the quickie, is that our theories about global warming are completely wrong.

This is a graph from a paper by Uri Gneezy and Aldo Rustichini, who set out to test, at the beginning of this decade, what they called deterrence theory.

The article deserves careful study.

CiteSeer Scientific Literature Digital Library

It's just been published in the British Journal of Educational Technology.

So the theory's kaput it's nothing.

Now both these sources of information carry important information.

With this idea in mind, Jeanny and I read through some hundreds of scientific articles on the Internet, and we drafted a research proposal in the beginning of our grade 12 year.

We have to make this available for people.

She contributed an article to the newspaper.