And to see if there's moderation, we just take the product of those two predictors.

You see a higher density of particles over here and over here, than you see, for example, over here.

These are old faculty salaries.

'Cause you may think you know what he's capable of, but you have no idea what I'm capable of.

Before, when we just did simple regression, that was our equation.

That's really important.

Forecast

This was utterly unforeseeable.

And they estimated that in 2008,

Here are my best guesses. Okay?

We actually think the future's going to be event driven.

What did you expect when you made it?

And then I'll observe again the 2.

Monthly estimates

We can just conclude that. This more complex model.

I don't know what you do.

I predicted this ambush

Suppose he predicts you'll go there.

We think it's very important.

There's also a measurement update step where we use the measurement z.

Do research where two models are competing against one another.

In India, I once met a man who predicted his own death right down to the number and placement of the bullets that killed him.

The regression equation is just the model. You'll see that our, our models will get more complex.

There's a new covariance matrix, and for the third observation followed by the prediction, the prediction is correctly effectively 4, 3.999.

Here is the demand forecast for 1998.

But most of the world in the middle are pushing forwards very fast.

There's different things you could try to do with machine learning technique.

And analysts predict it will open

Take upstairs.

We're expecting resistance

About a hundred yards off the reef. Right where we always said she'd be.

The arrow calculation, the matrix S with a transpose, the Kalman gain K with the inverse, back to my next prediction and my measurement update, and this is the prediction step.

You were right all along. You were right before anybody.

H. Bradford Westerfield, Yale University Press.

For the past five years, this guy's predicted 88 .

It's sort of like ding, ding, ding.

We can't predict any particular project, but the result of this whole worldwide, chaotic, unpredictable activity of competition and the evolutionary process of technology is very predictable.

Try to feel his next movement.

Is that good or bad?

Any guesses? 1816.

But then he predicts that you'll predict what he predicted too.

You obviously do what the precautionary principle suggests, you try to anticipate it, but after anticipating it, you constantly asses it, not just once, but eternally.

XTide Tide Predictor

So that's a toggler.

You can follow it through the fossil record.