So now what I'm going to do and, actually, this is going to get pretty messy is, I'm going to raise actually, let me write this a little more space.

And they're going to make fancy computer models with some assumptions.

So the value is going up.

What's also interesting, if you look at products that have a high component of what you might call messaging value, a high component of intangible value, versus their intrinsic value

Oh I can't keep undoing.

They are worth more than we are.

Some of them have a lot, some of them have a little bit.

And at the end of 2010, probably because the patent is now expired and anyone can go out and produce whatever that invention that was patented without having the patent, we then say that the patent is worthless.

In this case, you're saying that the equity in this company is worth 189,000.

But the market value or assets is essentially, what is the market saying the assets are worth?

We just made it explicit.

They're like, you know what, these guys have a 10 chance of being worth a billion dollars, and a 90 of being worth 0.

Construct a Numeric Value

But, actually, it's suddenly come to me after years working in the business, that what we create in advertising, which is intangible value you might call it perceived value, you might call it badge value, subjective value, intangible value of some kind gets rather a bad rap.

Somebody well worth reading.

That would be in its own file that has a functions related to art.

And the answer is no, it isn't. It is somewhat inconsistent.

So it transformed a linear process into a closed loop model, and it created more value in the process.

Up rounds are when your pre money valuation of this round is more than the post money valuation of the last round.

This is just an artificial convention.

So the balance sheet is really trying to capture what your asset is worth at that point in time.

So, this is not something pretty and nice to do.

What's their approximate worth?

The pen indicates this is an outline style.

Why is that?

There's a new set of values, a new set of things people value.

Because I am much older, much cleverer, and much less valuable

A program may have type errors, like if you try to divide a string by an integer, or it may have any number of other exceptions.

The worth of a state, in the long run, is the worth of the individuals composing it.

It's invaluable, sir.

You know, this is actually very hopeful.

little abstract here, but I really want to hit this point home because a lot of people, I think, are still under the notion that somehow something is somehow tradeable for gold, that it is of a sounder currency, while if it's an obligation of a government with a very dynamic economy, but not gold, it's somehow backed by less wealth, but I'd argue that this is actually a more profound amount of wealth.

In your final submission, please exclude any printouts so we can modify the grid and these values for success probabiilty and collision cost, and we can see what your code generates.

But you, you have vision. Carnelian reborn and rebranded.

So let's apply what we just learned to help complete our interpreter to fill out what it means to evaluate statements.

My idea is worth reading.

So according to the accounting, this equipment is no longer worth 500,000.

I don't care what the actual share price is.

This improves over the existing value.

There's not a whole lot of value, and it's very hard to debug regular expressions that are really long and do your entire program in one go.

Yeah, these are kinda cliché. So, but, this one is so much fun, that gt gt gt laugh gt gt gt this one's worth seeing.

If a thing is worth doing it is worth doing badly.

so that when they cross rivers they can get across by themselves.

By applying this update equation recursively, we can attain this value function over here.

And actually we can get more value for what we have here if we keep it running.