Now, this is where the grouping comes in.

Restrictions

You want to split the first degree term into two terms.

That's the whole point of factoring by grouping.

It's classified.

What do we need to rethink?

That information is confidential.

This is too fucking important.

Groups for this article

But let's do some grouping.

It's classified.

It's classified.

You know, that information is confidential.

Told you, it's classified.

What's the major concern?

This is the same thing as 2x times x plus 8. 16 divided by 2 is 8, x divided by x is 1. So this is 2x times x plus 8.

Make the engines a priority.

People, listen up! This is a full priority situation.

Really?

Priority number one

Secret relationship.

We've kept it out of the media.

It's our highest priority, sir.

It's between Queeg and Queeg.

Here are the proposed agenda items for the meeting on January 28.

that's our first priority. that's our only priority right now.

Clearly, this falls into the absolutely necessary category.

That's the number one priority.

And then I asked the usual question

Oh,you got a secret agenda,huh?

All right, just a few things before we get started here.

Now we're ready to group this thing we can group these first two terms, they are both divisible by k, and then we can group these second two terms.

So you could have broken this up into 0 b squared, and you could have broken if up into 6b 10b, and then factor is by grouping. Group these first two terms, group these second two terms.

I can't reveal the details of our assignment, but I can tell you this

My decision is final and irrevocable

What I'm about to tell you is classified.

And then so within the labor force, you have a subset

And so one technique to factor this is to factor by grouping. You could also use the quadratic formula.

PSK cannot be empty.

If I use that eraser

It's second on my list, believe me.

Write your name in the top right corner followed by birth date and social security number.

There's nothing more important to me than the Expo.

I want to know, is this a reliable instrument, is this a reliable measure of extroversion?

All I did here is I took this middle term and, using this technique right over here, I split it into 16x minus x, which is clearly still just 15x.