JOLANKA NlCKERMAN Methane is actually a very potent greenhouse gas.

So I can tell you how far we have come in the ensuing 12 years.

This is not the very distant future.

Here's a little question.

But they're also materials with very high energy and very high greenhouse gas emissions in their process.

Surprisingly, agriculture is the biggest contributor to climate change.

Go to ClimateCrisis.org or CarbonCalculator.com and buy carbon credits.

And this is the object of their scrutiny.

Well not in our state!

CO2e emissions are equivalent emissions of all the greenhouse gases and particles that cause warming and converted to CO2.

In doing so, we'll be removing a large part of our greatest carbon sink and replacing it with the most high greenhouse gas emission oil in the future.

So what we're doing is, we're taking the most concentrated greenhouse gas sink, twice as much greenhouse gases are sequestered in the boreal per acre than the tropical rainforests.

A greenhouse effect. Everything is burning up.

So it's a bit counterintuitive, but by collecting methane and burning it, which converts it into carbon dioxide, you're actually dramatically reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from the landfill.

Why do we need to study this anymore?

This is a U.S. statistic about the impact of greenhouse gases.

The second pressure on the planet is, of course the climate agenda the big issue where the policy interpretation of science is that it would be enough to stabilize greenhouse gases at 450 ppm to avoid average temperatures exceeding two degrees, to avoid the risk that we may be destabilizing the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, holding six meters level rising, the risk of destabilizing the Greenland Ice Sheet, holding another seven meters sea level rising.

And that is now what we're trying to do, and working with this large cities group to fight climate change, to negotiate huge, big, volume deals that will enable cities which generate 75 percent of the world's greenhouse gases, to drastically and quickly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a way that is good economics.

Usually when we think about the atmosphere, we think about climate change and greenhouse gases, and mostly around energy, but it turns out agriculture is one of the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases too.

And now you hit it with a little hydrogen gas.

And then we have two parameters which we were not able to quantify air pollution, including warming gases and air polluting sulfates and nitrates, but also chemical pollution.

Its changes will affect all of humanity.

Natural watered lawn is a very good cooling source stabilizing temperature, and using dehumidified air to create comfort.

Furthermore, per kilogram of manure, you have much, much less ammonia and fewer greenhouse gases when you have insect manure than when you have cow manure.

And I mean that with all seriousness.

Simple microbes could have evolved in those waters.

These diagrams that show that nuclear is somehow putting out a lot of greenhouse gases a lot of those studies include, Well of course war will be inevitable and therefore we'll have cities burning and stuff like that, which is kind of finessing it a little bit, I think.

We stopped irrigating our soil, as much as we could.

So an 82 percent absolute reduction translates into a 90 percent reduction in greenhouse gas intensity relative to sales.

You see, hydrofluoric acid won't eat through plastic.

It's the single largest emitter of greenhouse gases of any human activity in the world.

If so, more warming is in the pipeline.

The first way, which is the most important way, is through reducing the emissions from our own operations.

And so I get to think of places that have nothing to do with Google's core business, but where we can really have a big impact in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The next big issue, deforestation.

Steel represents about three percent of man's greenhouse gas emissions, and concrete is over five percent.

Even though it's Earth like, and even though early in its history it may very well have harbored Earth like life, it soon succumbed to runaway greenhouse that's an 800 degrees Fahrenheit surface because of rampant carbon dioxide.

Because California was the first state in this country to mandate 25 percent reduction of greenhouse gases by 2020.

And we're replacing that with the largest industrial project in the history of the world, which is producing the most high carbon greenhouse gas emitting oil in the world.

You take this stream of this blanket salt off and you put it in this fluoride volatility column.

If Greens globally found some reason to re assess nuclear, but we only have a limited amount of money.

When animals like us eat those plants our stomachs convert that food back into energy for our own growth.

They're absolutely critical ecosystems, they clean air, they clean water, they sequester large amounts of greenhouse gases, and they're home to a huge diversity of species.

And you hit it with some electricity and the HF will split into hydrogen gas and fluorine gas.

And I would say that we live in a country five percent of the world's population, 25 percent of the greenhouse gases, but also 25 percent of the world's prisoners.