Let's go through the answer together.

I defined a field called policy of the same size as my grid, initialized it with lots of spaces.

They may show up or not.

You can view this as sort of a convenient way of filtering.

That gives me the vector of res, and res is being output using those show command and returned from the procedure.

And then when I call smooth, I add fix as a parameter.

Use the interpreter to define a procedure t_LANGLESLASH that matches it.

I want to get this part out. I'm going to show you a new way to do that in Python.

In the upper right hand corner is the PDF button

Then I know I've changed something.

I just extract those into conveniently named variables by pulling out the 0, 1, 2, 3rd element of this tuple.

Now I'm going to walk you through believe it or not the recursive solution to this problem.

That's in the language of the grammar, so I desperately hope that our procedure is going to find that out.

It's like the junior grade version of it, even this will be a lot of fun.

There is now bearing noise and steering noise and distance noise. The code that you wrote didn't have any of those.

So let's go over the answer together.

These strings might be bell space hooks , grace space hopper , or alonzo space church .

Here is the code that I promised you in the quiz I would add, and there it is.

May be empty may have more things.

I want you to update the measurement first, then the motion.

Another kind of statement is the return statement.

Nicely done.

It turns out that learning grammars from examples is really, really difficult.

Note that I did not write the word return.

What I'd like you to do is write a Python procedure, using the Interpreter called addtochart that takes 3 arguments the chart, a Python dictionary, the index, a number, and the state more on that later, but it could be anything and it ensures that if I go look at chart index later, it will return a list it will evaluate to a list that contains state exactly once.

Now that we know how to find strings and how to chomp them up,

I'm going to give us a pExact of 0.8, pOvershoot of 0.1, and pUndershoot of 0.1.

I'll just set things up.

Maybe I'll even interview you on the air. Wh what what's your name ?

I'm going to have the following code in our parser framework.

I can just take that particle, add it, append it, and repeat.

P goes to nothing, and then down here I've got a candidate input open open close close.

If we start with a exp and we expand it to depth 1, we get 4 new utterances, 4 new sentences.

Formally, these statements are said to refer to control flow because they guard how execution flows through your procedure.

Name, name...

Tell me your name.

So I'm going to write a special Add procedure, treating the right hand side of the chart as if it were a set.

Primary Name, Other Names

That means 12,000. Agreed?

What was the name on the card?

Your names, first and last.

Identify yourself, program.

So that guy who made a scene is a member of the notorious F4? notorious?

As is the case with most of these examples, we're going to use a recursive strategy.

There already is an action with this name If you do n't have such an useraction the name is used by Krusader for an internal action