Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

Whereas before we measured ranges or distances, now we measure bearings or angles.

The audio level must not exceed 80 db.

So I'd have to write negative, we're assuming this is going out,

So one we said that one of the things we held constant (Let me write this down.)

But that's not the only thing we have on the left hand side we also have these other three kilograms.

I've heard of such things before.

So this spreadsheet, I've plotted the normal distribution.

let's say they're just really good at their analysis and figuring out market psychology and things like that.

And then we observe the value iteration converged and we're able to define a policy if we're assuming the argmax under the value iteration expression, which I don't spell out over here.

And in the previous videos, the constants all merged together.

Our profit in the first period is 30,000.

Where'd you be, if he took a drop over and above, and had a fancy to go for you?

I want to focus on three important assumptions here.

So let's for a second, just pick a point on this distribution over here.

If I can reset June's presentation to about 3 or 4 slides ago.

Let's work through an example

There were other complicated shape.

But it's a variant event for which I know the motion but not the structure.

looking at the coin.

Because it is a little bit of a game.

They have all sorts of stuff.

That's just 1 s.

Well, now we got a problem.

And we can turn its heartbeat on and off by going in and out of suspended animation like you would a light switch.

We are in replay mode, however.

What Sobel test is doing is, it starts out by assuming that the indirect effect and again, by indirect effect, What I mean is this guy.

That was an assumption we had to make early on when we took our limits as t approaches infinity.

It could be function of just y.

Actually, You could take a right over here, and you could redefine one of the elements so you could say... you could say a..... you could say let's reset...... (do it in that same pink color)

Let me assume my velocity is 0.

I can save on lighting calculations each frame.

So how could you take advantage...?

So, in order to make this statement, in order to stay along this curve, we have to assume that this thing is constant.

A possible explanation for what you just observed.

The Laplace transform of 1 we just did it at beginning of the video was equal to 1 s, if we assume that s is greater than zero.

And in particular I'm going to set up an unfair coin

But anyway, don't want to get too complicated.

So what if theta 1 is equal to 0.5. What happens then?

Maybe I'll experiment doing it the other way. but let's assume this is g prime of x, and let's assume this f of x.

It could actually be 90 as advertised and you were just unlucky, but we believe that high probability of this is correct or is the data actually contradicting this claim and you should complain that the claim is incorrect.

One we assume that we have normal distributions in both variables X and Y. Two, we assume that we have a linear relationship between X and Y. And three, there's an assumption called homoscedasticity.

I'll just show you some Python syntax that I've been using that is pretty helpful.

So x minus 2, times x minus 1.

It's as interesting a side effect as it could be.