Based on what, Mark your spidey sense?

So, we think we should treat them differently than we would want to be treated.

It does. That's a medical fact.

Based upon?

Why is that?

What would account for that?

It's not there?

They had no right to take that plant. Forget the plant.

There is no scientific basis for these claims.

Maybe he still will.

Tell them it's a suicide.

And to whom?

How can you be sure?

What makes you say that?

What grounds do you have for your claims?

How do you know that?

What makes you say that?

How do I know?

Based on what facts?

I would.

You don't know what you're talking about,martin.

What are his odds out there?

It's about collecting empirical evidence.

look at this situation and say, Well, there's nothing for the Dalai Lama to be really right about really right about or for Ted Bundy to be really wrong about that admits of a real argument that potentially falls within the purview of science.

This is what you need to remember.

What makes you so sure?

Call to arms against whom?

On what grounds?

I just found the whole thing absolutely incredible.

Our educational systems are inherited from the 19th century.

How do you know?

Why do we need this?

Mind you, I wouldn't bring it up if I thought the rumors would pass.

The reason we're meeting... is to quash all rumors that may be floating around out there.

complexity is another word for this.

Objection. TYLER

Think about it.

He has no basis for his opposition.

While she didn't have any medical evidence to back up her claim that there was a relationship between operatic arias and pulmonary hypertension, she was absolutely emphatic

I want to see why do you you just say so? That's not good enough.

It sounds arrogant to say that most people are smarter than the average person.

He has no basis for his opposition.

Yes, we do. But only at the lowest level.

Even if there's not a word of truth to it. But what do I hang it on?

No. I have a reason.