Oh my goodness, here we go again.

Language is subject to interpretation.

The only way that it would move is if there is a lot more force on one side than there is on the other side

It will occur without adding any more greenhouse gasses.

Justice is balance.

What he is saying is that something that has a constant velocity will continue to have that constant velocity indefinitely

But if you put something on top of it, it disbalances it.

legitimized by a democratically elected government,

We've got to keep balanced!

Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the Matrix.

The ice will still not move

The trade imbalance bulks large in our minds.

The first is that we will not evolve.

So this right here will be a balanced force

And the land, to depths of tens of meters, is also warming.

He... will bring balance.

Military power is important.

And these were somewhat noticed.

The equalization of the oceanic

The ball would keep going on forever, this ice block would be going on forever

And you were to throw a ball, that ball would literally keep going in that direction forever

But what will come in the future?

So, another way to rephrase what they're saying is that if there's something every body persists so everything will stay at rest or moving at a constant velocity unless it is compelled to change its state by force, unless it is acted on by a force especially an unbalanced force, and I'll explain that in a second.

And yet, it never happens.

Then tell me the outcome for the game for each player for that equilibrium point.

But you can see those spikes, and they're there.

And no, we do not disrupt the balance.

And the frogs that are exposed to atrazine, the testes are full of holes and spaces, because the hormone imbalance, instead of allowing sperm to be generated, such as in the testis here, the testicular tubules end up empty and fertility goes down by as much as 50 percent.

But while this wealth is produced by the work of all past and present this wealth is unevenly distributed among citizens

So we understand that if something is at rest, it is going to stay at rest unless there is some force that acts on it.

So the key quantity is Earth's energy imbalance.

The 3 would be the strategy for the politicians.

What I want you is find the equilibrium point for this game.

After all, at least on paper, there's this notion that these state budgets are balanced.

A balanced force

They got instant democracy in the 1990s elections without checks and balances.

The orchestration of Crime.Net is a never ending challenge.

And by the way, mistrust was always very important for democracy.

What was the key element of this that actually caused the outrage, do you think?

The budget must be balanced.

So it's almost common sense.

And I use that word advisedly.

light and darkness?

There will be one equilibrium point. I want you to find it.

dividing Guttermeg's principle of opposing forces in motion, and adjusting for the difference in equilibrium...