The red ones are where the nuclear power plants are located.

Neo penitentiary modern.

And now for this new equation, where I multiplied both sides by mu.

But anyway, this is exact.

This mu of x is when we multiply it, the goal is, after multiplying both sides of the equation by it, we should have an exact equation.

I thought all the trains were stopped.

This is an exact equation.

Exact equations.

This is a sign of great intelligence.

Let me write that down.

And we knew that it involved this square.

Totally dead. Way dead.

(BOTH MOANING)

The boy is totally dependent on his parents.

For six years, Oxana Malaya spent her life, living in a kennel, with dogs.

To get to you.

And when we did that, we tested it.

So you get 4 times y squared minus 4y.

And what does an exact equation look like?

Now there's one alternate way that you could factor this and it'd be completely legitimate.

Both buildings burned down.

And this is the partial, with respect to y.

Make it exact.

And, in the last video, we had this differential equation.

One, how do I know that it's an exact equation?

But when we took the partial derivative of this expression, which we could call M with respect to y, it was different than the partial derivative of this expression, which is N in the exact differential equations world.

Discreet Screen Savers Only

Perfect Only

This partial with respect to y, is this, times y prime.

Full format is a low level and high level format. It erases everything on the disk.

So let's put that aside and let's explore another property of partial derivatives, and then we're ready to get the intuition behind exact equations.

Take out the coolant pump to access the middle leveling screw on this side

Multiply it times our original differential equation.

By matching high jaw cutting pressure to high work piece cutting pressure

It's filled with the kind of craft laws that come from something being the first of its kind.

We had a differential equation that, at least superficially,

Or perhaps, a mind less bound by the parameters of perfection.

So I gave up photography.

We take the partial with respect to x, and we get that is equal to 2x plus y.

We basically got to the main points that I wanted to tell you about.

In the last video, we saw that these can be pretty straightforward to solve if the left hand side is a perfect square.

This whole situation is completely fucked.

I haven't completely given up the idea.

If it's not separable, but you can still put it in this form, you say, hey, is it an exact equation?

So this is not exact.