Again, what do you think could help us get the right answer this time?

Setup Virtual Machine

Hypothetically.

Because it is a little bit of a game.

So this is all just running descriptives to figure out if you truly have normal distributions.

I have no need of that hypothesis.

Don't torture yourself with hypotheticals.

And then what's the derivative of y squared with respect to x?

Check that box if you think that would be helpful.

Warning Assuming normal speed.

That was just a kind of a what if conversation.

Assuming, of course, they text each other.

You can configure how many virtual desktops there are.

But maybe y is equal to e to some constant r, times x.

So what I did in yellow, both this bright yellow and this

John's hypothetical man

Okay, what assumptions did you make?

Seems the logical assumption.

This is our original y.

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.

Well what's this term going to do?

Olivia, this isn't like before.

It is open .. it is open to subjectivity, and a lot of that subjectivity is all around the assumptions that you choose to make.

You have a sales force and you're selling directly to the end consumer.

Let us suppose that the news is true.

We, will assume there's no correlation between x and y.

These simplifying assumptions will allow us to do an analysis that is more tractable.

Fortunately it stopped, not because anyone understood arithmetic, it stopped for other reasons.

Let's say at minus 20 the height is very low.

We finish this step for a search.

So let's apply this cocky attitude to the problem of multiplying two integers.

Suddenly, it's not so hypothetical, is it?

If you were dying of thirst. What he would or wouldn't do doesn't interest me.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

When you're done with this, you arrive at a number that now combines the cancer hypothesis with the test result.

So, what's the proof?

It could actually be 90 as advertised and you were just unlucky, but we believe that high probability of this is correct or is the data actually contradicting this claim and you should complain that the claim is incorrect.

So, what do we do now?

So, let's go back to that normal distribution.

I'll assume it's just a function of x.

We get in here, is halts (tsif) true?

This is all hypothetical, isn't it, Tom? All academic?

And our null hypothesis is equals p 0.9 and our alternate hypothesis, if it doesn't work, as well as the null hypothesis, so p is smaller than 0.9.

And the way this works, is, in null hypothesis significance testing, which is a mouthful so I'll just say NHST, we assume, the null hypothesis.

There were other complicated shape.