It could actually be 90 as advertised and you were just unlucky, but we believe that high probability of this is correct or is the data actually contradicting this claim and you should complain that the claim is incorrect.

Here are the outcomes and here are the probabilities.

The Laplace transform of 1 we just did it at beginning of the video was equal to 1 s, if we assume that s is greater than zero.

Well what's this term going to do?

We know from definition that 1 is equal to i times i. Everything seems pretty straightforward right now. And then they'll say,

Let us suppose that the news is true.

How many edges do we have in a grid graph?

There is usually actually four of those.

Check that box if you think that would be helpful.

I am skipping that now because we've done it previous examples, you've done it in previous assignments.

Check here if you think it's guaranteed to do that.

Don't torture yourself with hypotheticals.

When you're done with this, you arrive at a number that now combines the cancer hypothesis with the test result.

In the magenta situation, the thing in the absolute value sign was positive 2, because this was a situation where we assumed that the thing in the absolute value sign was a positive 2.

I want to focus on three important assumptions here.

So now, we have two hypotheses and we'd like to test them.

And you'll see what I mean because I'll change that assumption in a second.

So what I did in yellow, both this bright yellow and this

So, what do we do now?

We could have arrived here in 3 different ways.

So this spreadsheet, I've plotted the normal distribution.

We don't address the problem of how to get from here to Paris or what streets to take

Because it is a little bit of a game.

This is what I assume about annual maintenance.

Remember, this is in a situation, if I assume that I don't have a blue forehead.

So let's for a second, just pick a point on this distribution over here.

And our null hypothesis is equals p 0.9 and our alternate hypothesis, if it doesn't work, as well as the null hypothesis, so p is smaller than 0.9.

Fortunately it stopped, not because anyone understood arithmetic, it stopped for other reasons.

We're assuming that the coin can't land on its edge and remain standing straight up.

We get in here, is halts (tsif) true?

So, what's the proof?

The audio level must not exceed 80 db.

And the way this works, is, in null hypothesis significance testing, which is a mouthful so I'll just say NHST, we assume, the null hypothesis.

And then our function is equal to 9 if x is equal to 5.

Mr. Chekov is correct. I can confirm his telemetry.

But anyway, don't want to get too complicated.

Here's how we do it.

But maybe y is equal to e to some constant r, times x.

So, the population of wine experts is 300.

I'll assume it's just a function of x.

This means that quantum theory has got to be, in some sense, true.

So I'd have to write negative, we're assuming this is going out,

Maybe I'll experiment doing it the other way. but let's assume this is g prime of x, and let's assume this f of x.

But let's assume that f of t grows slower than e to the st, or it diverges slower than this converges, is another way to view it.

Again that y and y cancel, then we do indeed get xy minus z, which we had assumed holds in advance, so that's a times b.