Let's say we had a triangle that looks like this.

So, this idea of sacredness, whether or not there is a God.

And you'll notice that there's a very heavy bias towards North America and Western Europe.

I'm one of those openminded kind of guys.

Please don't think I'm prejudiced No, no

If the total number of observations is 111, that's just not possible.

I no longer overload myself gratuitously.

As a result, the answer is usually less impacted by the data than it is for maximum likelihood.

But anyway, so this can also be written as the partial of y, with respect to x sorry, the partial of y, and then we took the partial of that with respect to x.

I have a migraine.

Because if you already know the answer to your trial, you shouldn't be doing one.

You're a neat worker yourself. Well, we're both prejudiced.

Thrun And the answer is 3 4.

And one of my big concerns with a lot of policy things today is things are getting too abstract.

Try and hold 'em off. Angle the deflector shields while I make the calculations... for the jump to light speed.

But after we take the square root, it only gets bigger by 1.5 since the square root of 1.5 squared is equal to 1.5.

that's tuna.

So this just means the partial of psi, with respect to x.

He has a prejudice against jazz.

What happens when we take the partial, with respect to x, and then y?

Think of it as a coin that only has heads.

You have 4 coins in a bag 3 of them are unfair in that they have a 45 chance of coming up tails when flipped the rest are fair so for the rest of them they have a 50 chance of tails or 50 chance of coming heads

So let me go over that last example one more time.

A common measure of intelligence, IQ, is distributed with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.

What is the probability of rolling a 6?

He is prejudiced against her.

We took psi, up here, we treated the functions of x as a constant, and we just took the partial derivative with respect to y.

Since Yi is just the individual observation Xi multiplied by 1.5, it's 1.5 times 9, which is 13.5.

He will never get anywhere with that prejudiced idea.

We add those up we get 250 and now we divide by 5 to get back our 50.

I paid a lot of money for it and the wizard that sold me the coin told me the probability of head is equals 0.3.

So now, if we consider this whole thing our new M, the partial derivative of this with respect to y should be equal to the partial derivative of this with respect to x.

But one thing I do know is this

Looking for somebody sincere, open minded, thoughtful.

Because we know that the derivative, with respect to x of psi, is equal to the partial of psi, with respect to x, plus the partial of psi, with respect to y, times y prime.

I don't have a prejudice against foreign workers.

So, I think that recognition these days, is focused much too much on appearances.

And what I want to do

Now we're going to talk of probability where we can think of equally likely events

That's why 50 50 would be the goal.

Well, it's 3x squared, that's just kind of a constant coefficient of y, plus 2xy, that's the partial with respect to y of that expression.

I'd argue picking 1 at 0.5 and once I pick the fair coin, I know that the probability of heads is, once again, 0.5 which makes it 0.25

Now that we know that in mutually exclusive events you can just multiply the probabilities.

So how do we test that? Well, that's easy.

We're losing a deflector shield. Go strap yourselves in.