But that assumption was a problem.

People are a little risk averse. So what?

The function is a little bit different, but you can work that out.

So let me rewrite it down here, maybe in a new color.

You have to hire them to spend a lot of time.

Again, it could be a social consequence for a need or it could be a business consequence they get more sales, etc.

We're on problem 14.

It's a hypothesis,

There's an inherent problem with low probability events.

So what if I were to ask you, what is h of g of negative 1?

You can't deal with the security problem in the way that you need to.

What's the difference?

I think we're okay.

Tom explained the matter in detail.

This is the final exam homework solution.

In this video, I'd like to show you the hypothesis representation, that is, what is the function we're going to use to represent our hypothesis where we have a classification problem.

Why is that a common problem in our society and all over the world today?

Look at this closely and notice that that is the same hopefully it's the same as our original problem.

He explained the matter to me.

Which equation is equivalent to

We can go from that cube to that cube.

We're going to talk about how to extend classicial planning to allow active perception to deal with partial observability.

And I should emphasize, we're talking about computational problems here.

To address this problem in a model selection setting, if we want to evaluate a hypothesis this is usually what we do instead.

So, I think the message I take, from what I read from the book, from what Armstrong said, and from all these people, is that these are neighborhoods.

The basic picture that you can have in your head is something like this,

He explained the matter in detail.

That's a lot of whatifs.

So this is a huge practical problem.

The very same day. Pépinot got into trouble,

Different day, same problem, huh, Lincoln?

Think of those as like two alternate universes.

In people we trust.

Does every French utterance have an equivalent Japanese utterance?

Of course if you retain and the null is in fact true, then great you made the correct decision.

So before I go on with how we're going to approach this problem,

Because it is a little bit of a game.

When that doesn't work, when it turns out those people have all the same facts that we do and they still disagree with us, then we move on to a second assumption, which is that they're idiots.

So, this is going to be a lot of code, and I'm not going to go through it line by line.

I'm in agreement on that matter.

12 7 is 5.

That's kind of a good example, but how does that help us solve the problem?

(Laughter)

1,005 minus 616.

Yes that's what happened in the actual case but if there were a lottery and they all agreed to the procedure you think that would be okay?