thanks. that much, i understand.

The next thing to do, if we're going to decompose this into its components, we have to figure out the factors of the denominator right here, so that we can use those factors as the denominators in each of the components, and a third degree polynomial is much, much, much harder to factor than a second degree polynomial, normally.

It turns out, the DNA in the bacterial cell was actually methylated, and the methylation protects it from the restriction enzyme, from digesting the DNA.

And when it dies, it falls to the bottom and then it rots, which means that bacteria break it down.

And here's the method, it applies to anything

4 plus 3 plus 1 is 8, so you get 8 8 which is this entire whole.

Both of these are 2.

This is a perfect square.

And he says, It's not about a scientific rendering of a sheep.

And therefore less juice into the task, fewer puzzles solved and less favorable outcomes compared to you folks.

Which for 12 times 31, is this.

And now we know that both g and h are solutions of the original differential equation.

I have really opened my mind and, I have to say, my heart to have a greater understanding, to make other discoveries about nature and myself.

But, what I want to do in this video is try to give a primer on it.

This is a square of a binomial.

The first thing we need to do is we need to break this problem down into manageable chunks.

And the punctuation, things like the periods, and also clues like capital

And then if we take negative 8 plus 7, that is equal to negative 1, which is exactly the coefficient right there.

That's my claim, and if I can solve for a and b in a way that it actually does add up to this, then I'm done and I will have fully decomposed this fraction.

In this video, I would like to delve more deeply into this bias and various issue and understand them better as well as figure out how to look at and evaluate knows whether or not we might have a bias problem or a variance problem.

A simple set of metaphors as we can possibly come up with understand the architecture of the internet and you'll be fine.

And actually, often the most useful because in a lot of the applications of classical mechanics, this is all you need to solve.

So I could show you mine. It's just A's, T's, C's and G's.

So this could be 5 plus 10, and this could be 5 times 10.

Now we have a nice quadratic equation, and we can factor this thing on the left hand side.

Very different answers.

For any puts five, we're going to look at the row four and for 90 we look at the 0.92 tails, this one over here and they intersect at 2.132 and if we multiply this to 0.219, we get 0.467 approximately would have been the correct answer.

The second big surprise is how wrong we get emotions, there are some cultural things here, but it seems to be fairly universal.

The tricky part in designing it was figuring out how to take something mysterious, human attraction, and break it into components that a computer can work with.

Microsoft's approach to simplicity tends to be

That's something we often talk about with the kids when we're fooling around with things and breaking them open, and taking them apart and using them for other things.

Taking a watch apart is easier than putting it together.

And forgive yourself.

So this is k times k plus 3, and then we have a plus, and over here it looks like we could factor out a negative 6.

Eventually, these technologies will become so powerful that we will use them to know ourselves by deconstructing and reconstructing our own brains.

And shame is really easily understood as the fear of disconnection

So there's two ways to do it.

If 2 makes this 0, 2 should also make the factored expression 0.

So we have a, then instead of going to udacity, we do a again, and then we do udacity.

Copied it and now I have pasted it.

Minus 2 plus minus 1 is minus 3.

I agreed to put my country ahead of myself, like a mother does for a child.

And all we have are orientations which could have variances from multiple causes.

Instead of waiting for that garbage to sit there and pile up,

If we're making plastic synthetically, then we think the solution would be to break them down biochemically.