He's trying to do some good.

So the for profit sector can pay people profits in order to attract their capital for their new ideas, but you can't pay profits in a nonprofit sector, so the for profit sector has a lock on the multi trillion dollar capital markets, and the nonprofit sector is starved for growth and risk and idea capital.

Now we can do another notion, and that's return on equity.

Embedding nanoparticles in a material for instance, always.

So, in fact, both of these are also right.

Do we know that graph partitioning is in NP, and therefore an exponential time solution would exist?

You'll be a member of a democratically controlled investment opportunity who's primary role, after return to investors, shareholders, members, is returned to the community.

What did you use for reduction?

And at least it'll give you a sense of how revenues, gross profit, operating profit, pre tax income and net income really are different.

Minus 500,000.

This is what the owners of the company get before they pay the government.

(Laughter) But I know it's the bottom line, or one's perception of it, that motivates people in the end.

Maybe it wasn't obvious to you at first. Now that I putted that, it's probably pretty straightforward.

But here you see it means very, very different things.

This is really important to pay attention to, because so many people say, oh, a company made this much.

I'll just abbreviate that as Nl.

Your spirit belongs to Eywa.

We'll be able to make use of all that to evaporate more seawater and enhance the restorative benefits.

Go ahead, eat.

And when people talk about earnings of a company, this is what they're talking about.

Our interests clash with theirs.

One is by calling the closure or predicting.

Well, now we seen enough input to actually make a single (E).

(T) goes to (a) dot (Bc) it's really looking to see a big (B).

And so we took this number as the numerator and we divided by the number of assets.

Because in the last video I talked a little bit about return on asset, where we just took the operating profit, and we divide that by the assets.

Kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

The taxes will be 153,000.

I'm not a charity commissioner.

A benefit to both our worlds.

We are assuming a very simple world, were the is no taxes, we have no debt, we have no intrest or things

And I think this is an interesting thing.

So you've probably heard not only the term earnings, you've probably also heard the term earnings per share.

They buy more of your service and they tell more of their friends, which leads to more profit.

NP hard and therefore a polynomial time solution for that problem solves everything in NP.

So that's a nice thing to keep in the back of your mind, this return on asset concept, and it's very closely tied to operating profits and the actual assets of a firm.

And that's what these brands did.

FDlC insured.

And that's my dad found that.

The rewards would be... enormous.

So in fact, this one's correct as well wow, we're on a roll!

So it's as if we have this (E) in our input and we're going to shift over it.

And let's say, assume if I inherited this million dollars, I didn't finance it.

Before Interest and Taxes.

The reason this is happening boils down, in my mind, to one basic problem, which is our inability to perceive the difference between public benefits and private profits.