Right about now,Ms. Hewes, you don't seem to have a case.

Very nearly proof enough.

Released. No evidence.

The government lost because they couldn't link these guys.

I'd say the evidence in his house is plenty.

In the absence of definite evidence, he was acquitted.

Now, as a scientist, what's the evidence for this?

For circumstantial evidence, that's plenty.

But if she doesn't, based on the evidence I've seen,

The workers were released for lack of evidence.

And suppose you're wrong?

There wasn't enough evidence to convict him of the crime.

In the absence of sufficient proof, the police could not indict him.

Imagine her surprise, when the White Rabbit read out, at the top of his shrill little voice, the name 'Alice!' gt

She had a good argument in favor of choosing him as chairman.

There is absolutely no evidence to show that throwing people into detention cures their drug dependence.

He almost killed Harry. If that isn't proof enough...

Wondering, what is the right answer?

Proof?

No proof.

You have no proof of that.

God bless you!

There's the castings.

You wouldn't be Breaking the chain of evidence, Now, would you, abby?

Where is this evidence ?

Have you any proof?

How do you know?

Prove it.

Prove it.

Do you have any proof?

maybe there is no proof.

Intestinal complications.

What kind of evidence?

You have something here.

(Careful with that!

Obliterated, no evidence.

What do we got?

This is a valid point of view.

What?

No. I don't remember it. I just read about it in the papers.

Then how do you know that somebody else was there?

What evidence?

It's just coincidence.

That don't prove anything.

I'm gonna go out on a limb.