It's simple math.

I can remove B B 2.

Simple sharp

Here is Bayes Rule, and in practice, what we find is this term here is relatively easy to compute.

No, I totally didn't do that correctly. Man, you can't take me anywhere.

Chemical calculator

So, for a 1 unit increase in X, it's the predicted change in Y. Right?

It's going to be somewhat complicated.

Everything here is divisible by 2.

As I reflect on these experiences with you,

Toomre pretty much got everything right.

graphical user interface to computational chemistry packages

So that's not going to be right.

Well, it's just 5 away.

It's almost, you know, too easy.

How about that? Do you think your bank is going to show that to people?

You could try again and again to see whether the failure occurs or not.

I save it every time we're in this loop.

So there's all sorts of crazy things here, but if you just follow the Order of Operations, you'll simplify it in a very clean way and hopefully we'll all get the same answer.

My sculptures are normally very simplified.

And they write x plus 2, plus x minus 2, times 2x plus 1.

Over the change in x.

What do we get as a simplified input with this function?

Let's take 8 into 120.

Problem 40.

Calculate simple sums

This results in some number c.

So let's evaluate this from 0 to infinity.

Perform simple and scientific calculations

So we're going to hand over the process of simplification over to a machine, resulting in automatic simplification.

And besides, this is a simple plan.

What we've done is we deferred the calculation of the normalizer over here by computing pseudo probabilities that are non normalized.

Now let's get back to our simplification scheme.

And then he's going backwards.

So this we can simplify

This is correct multiplying something by 1 doesn't change its meaning but it's slower than necessary.

Another choice would be to calculate the ratio between the weight and how much its worth.

I'm going to let you figure this one out, what happens if stage B suddenly starts to take, instead of one nanosecond, it take three nanoseconds?

Simple

Marketing people have never been able to do that.

This is correct, because if it's simpler, takes less time, easier to understand.

Powerful and easy to use calculator

Anyway, he had to do all this because he was completely obsessed with output.

We might even make a competition of that.

In our initial setting, it took us 30 tests until we minimized the input.