Cost

And that's something which I'd like to elaborate on.

Majority rule is a basic principle of democracy.

Now either one of these is legititmate ways of accounting but its good to know the difference

So when Arab socialism started in Egypt, it spread across the region.

I'd like to know...

So that begs the next question.

Neoconservatism had the philosophy that you go in with a supply led approach to impose democratic values from the top down.

Democracy is the only game in town.

living on less than one dollar a day.

We can do this.

In so doing, the guardians of secular democracy in effect yield the connection between education and values to fundamentalists, who, you can be sure, have no compunctions about using education to further their values the absolutes of a theocracy.

Unfortunately, many of us in this room are supporters of capitalist policies and market forces.

Greek philosophers placed value on democracy.

Now what's our mantra of this day and age I wonder?

I think there is. I just want to turn to a few of them.

(Applause)

Alright?

We're going to explore in the days and weeks to come the contrast between consequentialist and categorical moral principles.

I mean this is singing your song isn't it? Well, it certainly is what I'm talking about in The demon haunted world .

In effect, they are the infidels.

Democracy will be victorious in the long run.

Here's another cartoon.

In the world of 4Shbab, it's not about bump and grind.

Thank you.

But actually going out to propagate that view is associated with either neoconservativism or with Islamist extremism.

But the majority of the world neither benefits from capitalism nor from democratic systems.

Fetch Missing Covers

Do not forget that fascism, communism, capitalism or other isms are all monetary systems.

Before, revolutions used to have ideological names.

Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man. Communism is the exact opposite.

Communist, Nazi, fascist ...

Let's say there's very little labor at my factory.

Their nationalism was one cause of the war.

Retrieve

Communism, capitalism...

Had there been no egoism, distrust, malicious behaviors, and dictatorships with no one violating the rights of others

So as I said, we looked to the status quo and ridiculed it.

Islamism meaning those who wish to impose one version of Islam over the rest of society why is it that they are succeeding in organizing in a globalized way, whereas those who aspire to democratic culture are falling behind?

The signs don't look good, some have said.

The second reason I undertook this is because

We know how much it takes to build our product.

What I do know is that it seems to be really important to think about the idea of the United States being in the lead of thinking about this issue of democracy.

If we look at Islamists, if we look at the phenomenon of far right fascists, one thing they've been very good at, one thing that they've actually been exceeding in, is communicating across borders, using technologies to organize themselves, to propagate their message and to create truly global phenomena.

And people actually, after the collapse of the Hosni Mubarak regime, the youth who have organized themselves in certain groups and councils, they are guarding the transformation and they are trying to put it on a track in order to satisfy the values of democracy, but at the same time also to make it reasonable and to make it rational, not to go out of order.