Justice is balance.

legitimized by a democratically elected government,

We've got to keep balanced!

Neither player wants to switch away from keeping with that strategy.

Oh my goodness, here we go again.

The ice will still not move

The first is that we will not evolve.

So this right here will be a balanced force

He... will bring balance.

Language is subject to interpretation.

Military power is important.

And these were somewhat noticed.

The only way that it would move is if there is a lot more force on one side than there is on the other side

The equalization of the oceanic

But what will come in the future?

It will occur without adding any more greenhouse gasses.

Then tell me the outcome for the game for each player for that equilibrium point.

But you can see those spikes, and they're there.

And no, we do not disrupt the balance.

The 3 would be the strategy for the politicians.

What I want you is find the equilibrium point for this game.

What he is saying is that something that has a constant velocity will continue to have that constant velocity indefinitely

After all, at least on paper, there's this notion that these state budgets are balanced.

They got instant democracy in the 1990s elections without checks and balances.

The orchestration of Crime.Net is a never ending challenge.

But if you put something on top of it, it disbalances it.

And by the way, mistrust was always very important for democracy.

The budget must be balanced.

So it's almost common sense.

And I use that word advisedly.

light and darkness?

There will be one equilibrium point. I want you to find it.

dividing Guttermeg's principle of opposing forces in motion, and adjusting for the difference in equilibrium...

Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the Matrix.

Bring balance to the Force, not leave it in darkness!

We should strike a balance between our expenditure and income.

The trade imbalance bulks large in our minds.

Look, brennan trained you for this exact moment.

Nature's balance is going to be upset everywhere.

Here we've ranked them for each party from 1 being the worst outcome to 9 being the best outcome.

But they lose, right?

Economists talk about game theory, that every two person game has a Nash equilibrium.

And the land, to depths of tens of meters, is also warming.

I think the eternal peace is possible, but, I don't know how to express it, only not through political balance.

from out of a necessity, Wesley. Necessity to maintain balance in a world.