Here's how it went.

Decision making.

And I'm going to show you why. Dilbert already knows, of course. Dogbert's tech support.

Each task was made up of many, many, many sub choices of course.

It all has to do with when you face what I call the INCA.

(Laughter)

The yellow line shows us the most likely path.

Finally.

Thanks, Johan, for the update...

Stage magic relies almost wholly on the momentum error.

Capture Whiz in Denver asked, It seems the AI techniques we've learned could be valuable for human use as well as robots.

That's a complicated problem that's a lot to know.

I appreciate a man who's calm and careful In his decision making.

If you were Portuguese, right? How about this one? One, two, three.

How about a two digit number?

For instance, five squared would be?

OK? So quickly, a two digit number please.

37 squared, OK.

A three digit number, sir, yes?

another three digit number, sir?

OK, another, another three digit number, sir? Audience

Yes. AB Yes?

That's why I pick a gentleman first.

OK, how about you, what year?

Call out, what year was it?

What year was it, first of all?

And what month?

Now, think of what I told you.

In fact, he basically invented Graph SLAM 200 years ago. He just didn't know about it.

An environment is fully observable if you can see the state of the environment which means if you can make all decisions based on the momentary sensory input.

Another suit, please.

Here is an MDP question.

He wants to solve ethics.

Terrifying, because we have stronger opinions about our hand held devices than about the moral framework we should use to guide our decisions.

Why would we use that verb, it doesn't feel right?

But the evidence seems conclusive.

Critical.

Citizen Kane, rose

Somebody? What?

If you do not think that, if you think something else, say nay .

Talk to me. Yes. Yes.

(Video) Guy Joey!

You can just call it out.

Who is killed in the family?

Politicians have no technical understanding, and thus provide no value when arriving at a decision.