The quarterly growth of 1.2 means an annual growth rate of 4.8 .

A quarterly growth of 1.2 means an annual growth rate of 4.8 .

Maximum rate of growth

Minimum rate of growth

Even low growth rates produce large increases over time.

In 2010 I expect this company to double every year.

So China, I've already mentioned, beginning around 1978, around the time of the death of Mao, growth ten percent a year.

You know if you look at the development in the West over 200 years, the average growth may have been about two percent.

Now here's eight centuries of economic growth.

Even in wealthy countries it is common now to see inequality growing.

The Japanese economy continued to grow by more than 5 annually.

The growth rate of the Japanese economy will top 0.7 this year.

We really do have it going right that the continent is growing at rates that people had thought would not happen.

That's an epidermal growth rate.

The vertical axis is just percent per year of growth, zero percent a year, one percent a year, two percent a year.

That's what we're seeing across the bottom billion at the moment.

From about the beginnings of humanity to 1500 zero economic growth, nothing.

Price increases explain the difference between the real and nominal growth rates.

When India was growing at about three, 3.5 percent and the population was growing at two percent, its per capita income was doubling every 45 years.

What do you want in a spaghetti sauce? Tell us what you want in a spaghetti sauce.

The economy of the country kept growing for years.

I mean this is over a four year period.

When annualized, the quarterly gain represents a 4 growth.

GNP increased at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.5 in the fourth quarter.

Maybe in 2010, Company A is going to make 2.50.

Couple years,it's gonna get really pissed off.

and pledge to continue our efforts towards realizing a nuclear free world together with Hiroshima

Japan's inflation adjusted GNP growth rate was 5 .

They paid 100,000 for it.

Just quickly on the results.

Growth is the proof of life.

This is something I call the 50 20 paradox.

And you're going to pay a lower Price to Earnings ratio if the company isn't growing.

If f(n) is in little o(g(n)), that's kind of like saying f(n) is strictly less than g(n).

It's a death sentence.

And that makes a huge difference.

You know, these economists, they love money, they want more and more of it, they want it to grow.

At that time you paid 5 for an all day lift ticket.

The right way to think about this is of all the terms in the sum here, you need to take the one with the fastest growth rate.

Over the last 30 years, in terms of the GDP growth rates,

All the rest went to the top one percent.

We commuted longer to work, but as you can see from this graph, the longer you commute the less happy you're likely to be.

And over the next 18 years have almost tripled.

Japan achieved a real GNP growth of 5 last year.

India is already at two tons per year.