Go to ClimateCrisis.org or CarbonCalculator.com and buy carbon credits.

Every single debate has been sponsored by Clean Coal.

If we start next year, it is six percent per year.

Why don't I hear how much energy Britain used yesterday, or American used yesterday?

If you could get a deal at Copenhagen, where people agreed,

like slowing emissions, are intrinsically slow, because it takes time to build all the hardware we need to reduce emissions.

This is not the very distant future.

We should go through these efficiency measures to start getting reductions

The choice here, to put a gas systematic ? in and collect ? and manage the landfill gas, was predicated on the fact that we could manage the carbon offsets, reduce our carbon footprint, and market carbon credits to the value which would assist in offsetting most of our cost.

So, because it went into mass production, costs were reduced, 100 years of refinement, emissions were reduced, tremendous production value.

So an 82 percent absolute reduction translates into a 90 percent reduction in greenhouse gas intensity relative to sales.

Surprisingly, agriculture is the biggest contributor to climate change.

The next big issue, deforestation.

But here's a case which is harder to reject.

The first way, which is the most important way, is through reducing the emissions from our own operations.

The big opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is actually in urbanizing the suburbs.

And I think this is what we've done with climate change.

That report, in fact, which had all the modern climate science the only thing they talked about doing was geo engineering.

It's more than all our electricity.

Inhaling diesel exhaust is bad for our health.

Exhaust gases of a car are noxious.

The world is buzzing at the moment with plans to force reductions in gas emissions at all costs.

When you can get rid of all of those because somebody doesn't use any of them really, you find that you can actually cut transportation emissions as much as 90 percent.

This is something that has to get to zero.

She pared down her expenditures.

So because of this, we could deal with the problem simply by stopping reducing emissions, and just as the concentrations go up, we can increase the amount of geo engineering.

The air was polluted by exhaust gas.

We worked on an organic compound... to reduce carbon emissions, slow down global warming.

Then hear this, please.

It's created a million jobs inside that country, and it's saved 32 million tons of CO2.

You want to reduce green house gases.

If you look at carbon dioxide from burning tropical rainforest, or methane coming from cows and rice, or nitrous oxide from too many fertilizers, it turns out agriculture is 30 percent of the greenhouse gases going into the atmosphere from human activity.

And that continues into the future with the renewables that we're developing today, reaching maybe 30 percent of primary energy by mid century.

But you can do something about that.

And the result of that is, we're going to generate 83,000 new jobs, four billion dollars a year in annual income, and reduce the CO2 emissions by 174 million tons a year.

It didn't even talk about cutting emissions, which is an incredible shift in our thinking about this problem.

You're saying you want a deal with all the different countries of the world where we're all bound together to cutting carbon emissions in a way that is to the benefit of the whole world.

We will look for methane as well as other gasses produced by living systems.

We can continue the search for the ingredients we love, and we can continue to spin yarns about our favorite meals.

Now, we've made great progress with automobile technology over the last 100 years.

Energy systems of the world becoming progressively year on year, decade on decade, century on century becoming less carbon intense.

In doing so, we'll be removing a large part of our greatest carbon sink and replacing it with the most high greenhouse gas emission oil in the future.

We have to start thinking about giving kickers to countries that are willing to go to this kind of scale.

Industrial emissions cause air pollution.

He's working at your place.