We should go through these efficiency measures to start getting reductions

And it also enhances nuclear weapons proliferation.

I'm really scared.

Every single debate has been sponsored by Clean Coal.

And as far as construction speed is concerned, nothing will beat Contour Crafting.

From now on we count per capita.

1 4 of the world's carbon dioxide emissions are from America its per capita emissions are also the greatest in the world.

This is the same problem that we had in the last video.

But here's a case which is harder to reject.

You can measure it again.

If you could get a deal at Copenhagen, where people agreed,

1 Hi Capacity Output Expander

So we all look at what we can do.

This is something that has to get to zero.

For everything that we can't reduce ourselves, we go out and we purchase high quality carbon offsets.

We can also make the color here represent the variable and what am I choosing here?

like slowing emissions, are intrinsically slow, because it takes time to build all the hardware we need to reduce emissions.

The differing volumes of carbon emissions are plotted in the graph below.

So if you add these two together, alone, you can see a separation that nuclear puts out at least nine to 17 times more CO2 equivalent emissions than wind energy.

We can continue the search for the ingredients we love, and we can continue to spin yarns about our favorite meals.

And it puts 18 thousand tons of carbon dioxide in the air.

It generates 30 of greenhouse gas emissions.

It's also one of the reasons why it is the largest and fastest growing single source of carbon in Canada, and it is also a reason why Canada is now number three in terms of producing carbon per person.

My new Lambhorghini 6496 cc very fast

So how do they want to insure that carbon emissions stay under this cap?

I think we can get that down to 50 percent.

We gotta vent the compartment! Venting complete. Fires are out.

Well, these Cap and Trade guys are saying that a new carbon stock market is the best way to get it done.

I think that part's great.

You divide it by the amount...

You divide it by the amount of peop...

But what we're missing is also some other emissions

The only machine capable to capture the carbon that we are producing, always, even if we reduce them, everything that we do, we produce CO2, are the trees.

like this one, the recent Icelandic volcano.

Carbon dioxide emission, metric ton per capita.

It's the exact same definition of slope we've always used.

That's 10 percent of the CO2 emissions across their entire country.

And if you look, wind and concentrated solar have the lowest CO2 emissions, if you look at the graph.

That's, in the additive, about 25 percent of our problem.

I drained his lungs.

On a population of nine billion our average carbon emission will have to be about two tons per year.

If they did, we would be shutting down all of our coal and gas plants based on radioactivity alone.

California emits only seven percent of U.S. CO2 emissions.

And, somehow, we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero.

Caught adjusting the telescope in 1000 dot to compensate for bullet drop.