Every single debate has been sponsored by Clean Coal.

If you could get a deal at Copenhagen, where people agreed,

like slowing emissions, are intrinsically slow, because it takes time to build all the hardware we need to reduce emissions.

We should go through these efficiency measures to start getting reductions

If we start next year, it is six percent per year.

But here's a case which is harder to reject.

That report, in fact, which had all the modern climate science the only thing they talked about doing was geo engineering.

So because of this, we could deal with the problem simply by stopping reducing emissions, and just as the concentrations go up, we can increase the amount of geo engineering.

Go to ClimateCrisis.org or CarbonCalculator.com and buy carbon credits.

It's created a million jobs inside that country, and it's saved 32 million tons of CO2.

You're saying you want a deal with all the different countries of the world where we're all bound together to cutting carbon emissions in a way that is to the benefit of the whole world.

I think we can get that down to 50 percent.

We can continue the search for the ingredients we love, and we can continue to spin yarns about our favorite meals.

The choice here, to put a gas systematic ? in and collect ? and manage the landfill gas, was predicated on the fact that we could manage the carbon offsets, reduce our carbon footprint, and market carbon credits to the value which would assist in offsetting most of our cost.

It didn't even talk about cutting emissions, which is an incredible shift in our thinking about this problem.

Why don't I hear how much energy Britain used yesterday, or American used yesterday?

And the result of that is, we're going to generate 83,000 new jobs, four billion dollars a year in annual income, and reduce the CO2 emissions by 174 million tons a year.

And it also enhances nuclear weapons proliferation.

The big opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is actually in urbanizing the suburbs.

I'm really scared.

And as far as construction speed is concerned, nothing will beat Contour Crafting.

So, because it went into mass production, costs were reduced, 100 years of refinement, emissions were reduced, tremendous production value.

And if someone could convince you that we actually can make the what was it? the 130 fold improvement in efficiency, of reduction of carbon footprint, would you then actually like that picture of economic growth into more knowledge based goods?

It is recommended that the 1 2 hose is connected directly to the Hose Barb with a Hose Clamp

Based upon the assumption that we're willing to only sacrifice 160 million people's lives to sea rise, climate change, and so forth, then January 2011, we need to start reducing

If we really want to come to a point, we really want to put a cap on our carbon emission, we want to really lower the use of energy it has to be solved in countries like India.

We have to have a unified view of how to go about this the struggle against poverty in the world and the challenge of cutting wealthy country emissions, all has a single, very simple solution.

The only machine capable to capture the carbon that we are producing, always, even if we reduce them, everything that we do, we produce CO2, are the trees.

We worked on an organic compound... to reduce carbon emissions, slow down global warming.

You can measure it again.

The first way, which is the most important way, is through reducing the emissions from our own operations.

So here's one way to think about it, which is that we just do this instead of cutting emissions because it's cheaper.

This is the same problem that we had in the last video.

That the CO2 problem, the climate problem that we've heard about, is driving lots of things innovations in the energy technologies that will reduce emissions but also, I think, inevitably, it will drive us towards thinking about climate and weather control, whether we like it or not.

We have the means already in our hands, through a structure, through a mechanism, called REDD Plus a scheme for the reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation.

It's saying that you do some geo engineering for a little while to take the worst of the heat off, not that you'd use it as a substitute for action.

She pared down her expenditures.

So let's say that we work hard, and we actually don't just tap the brakes, but we step hard on the brakes and really reduce emissions and eventually reduce concentrations.

So we all look at what we can do.

There is a tool that can help us bridge the digital divide, respond to emergencies, get traffic moving, provide a new engine for economic growth and dramatically reduce CO2 emissions in every sector.

And the problem is the following knowledge that geo engineering is possible makes the climate impacts look less fearsome, and that makes a weaker commitment to cutting emissions today.

Connecting the 1 2 hose directly to the hose barb, with a hose clamp, is preferred

But you can do something about that.

This is something that has to get to zero.

The differing volumes of carbon emissions are plotted in the graph below.