Theoretically, I'm doing math.

There are also some neat possibilities for education,

. ..mathematics, logic, physics, geology and bi ology?

Now here is the catch.

So this is the great paradigm.

So my provocative statement is that we desperately need a serious scientific theory of cities.

But what we want to propose, is that the highest levels of abstraction, things like mathematics, computing, logic, etc. all of this can be engaged with, not just through purely cerebral algebraic symbolic methods, but by literally, physically playing with ideas.

And, once again, this is very important.

And in both macro and micro economics, there is especially in the modern sense of it, there is an attempt to make them rigorous, to make them mathematical.

It's also the great theoretical triumph of biology.

I don't think anything is really B.

Yours is faith.

in theory, yes.

Logic Functions

Find you... between midnight and sunrise tomorrow, freedom for both of you.

And so if I multiply a complex number.

I don't have a clue.

It's actually a big name for little thing but this little thing again has big consequences.

This is the official definition of theory.

Logic Functions

Which means they have infallible powers of logic.

On the left you have Edward Witten.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

And interestingly, wearing a lap only seatbelt, 16.7 percent die.

I'd therefore like to propose that we employ, we enlist, the cutting edge field of copyright math whenever we approach this subject.

But if you try to explain why the first number one has to exist or what the first number one is in the first place, no matter how hard you try mathematically or logically, you'll never be able to explain or never be able to prove the existence of the number one, or what the first number one is.

There is a logical explanation.

It's hardly an act of logic.

Tony learns about the ontologically promiscuous, the epistemologically anxious, the ethically dubious, the metaphysically ridiculous.

So, everyone is also told, and this is true, everyone is a perfect logician.

Because, basically,

Theoretically.

This theory was founded on a scientific basis.

Over the years we've put so much in society into being able to process and think logically.

So I decided, what if you really did take the Bible literally?

This is going to be equal to 1.

Only theoretical records.

Seems the logical assumption.

Think about the theory of evolution.

And then and only then, we throw down that mathematical structure.

Let's say, in theory, I multiply a complex number c plus di times c minus di.

(Laughter).

Now, Galois is a very famous mathematician.

Well, I do think there's a good framework for thinking.

We're in this world.