So its slope is just delta I'm still using the line tool again delta y over delta x.

So let's figure out the slope of this line.

letter, that means change.

So, once again, we say slope is equal to change in y over change in x.

Well, let's take this as our starting point.

That is equal to there's a couple of things you might hear.

That won't change the inequality.

Well, what we can do is, we can say let's take this as a starting point.

So this is what went right.

Change in y would be this y.

The other is You are Power Full.

And as you can see, their behavior moves up in the direction of this change in the Nash equilibrium.

But we could've made this the first point.

We're not doing that at any scale on governance.

Changed since file open

So, change in y over change in x, or rise over run, well, change in y would be this 5.

Change Horizontal Alignment

Change Vertical Alignment

There was a huge difference in the world.

Change your vector!

So you learn that work is really the magnitude, let me write this down, the magnitude of the force, in the direction, or the component of the force in the direction of displacement.

But notice, I'm not really changing the properties of the rhombus, I'm just changing its orientation a little bit.

Are you driven by significance or love?

So the slope, if you saw the last module that just introduces how we calculate the slope, that's just rise over run.

If we made that the first point, then the change in y would have been I want to make it really cluttered, so to confuse you.

This is functional MRl.

We put billions of dollars into fuel efficient technologies.

So this is not true. An unbalanced force on an object will not always change the object's direction.

I didn't make the fenders move with the wheels like you wanted to, sir.

Yeah, we've had a change in wind direction.

Just... just stay on it.

From those observations you would say that the velocity points in the direction of this vector.

Family problems are becoming more and more common.

The car made an abrupt turn.

If say, universe was populated by particles such as galaxies or alignment of a clouds, and we can count, then their number per unit volume is something that will be also dependent on the expansion rate.

So times the cosine of the angle.

Wherever that's going is just wrong.

When you multiply it by a scalar, or you're not changing its direction.

So, it looks like Chile dodged two bullets.

Or another way of writing it, it's change in y over change in x.

If something is linear, then the change in y over the change in x always constant.

The only reason modern agriculture can get away with killing the life in the soil is through another use of fossil fuel.

再自然化 の話しが 伝えていることは 環境上の変化の必要性は 一方向から 発生するのではなく 希望 を提案し

You could say d work, or a differential of work.

But I really hope that you will all think of ways that you can