So that is our T distribution right there.

This is Keith Haring looked at statistically.

There is no accounting for tastes.

There is no accounting for tastes.

It is impossible to account for tastes.

There is no accounting for tastes.

I think this approach can explain differences in people's taste in art.

So this is equal to negative 14 plus 3, which is equal to negative 11.

So this area in between.

I realize that's an ambiguous statement.

Let me clear all of this, all of this business over here.

So that's the uv term right there.

You don't question that.

Next problem.

Now, I want to believe that this teacher meant well, but I was shattered.

But what is it you wish? When Mrs. Turner has brought in the tray I will make it clear to you.

Well, first, before I even tell you the cost

Actually, before I even do this, let's get one thing out of the way.

This is a very simple example we started with from the very beginning.

I'll make sure that he is.

Yeah, let me look into that.

Can you shed light on this?

The will clearly states...

I've been bitten harder. By dogs. I love dogs.

To give you an idea of the landslide, the next highest name pulled in three.

So even though it maybe very difficult to answer the question if you're given the right kind of information you can check it very fast.

Can you clearly define this word?

So let me show you an example.

And we are done.

I can't tell for sure.

There are many reasons, but the two that merit the little bit of time is one, the clarity of purpose is there.

There is no accounting for tastes.

And it's been so clear how much you all care about trying to make this world a better place.

Tomorrow leaves us hopes.

And this might seem a little silly to even ask this question.

So, how are we going to change the world?

He's awesome. He's so commanding. Yeah?

You see, but you do not observe.

There are two peaks in this red graph, which are in 2004 and 2008.

I'll be absent tomorrow.

I'll give an example of what this means in just a second.

First, I want you to remove the outliers by only extracting data between the lower and upper quartile.

That's where I prefer to be.

Why would this actually be computing multiplication?

Now I also wanna point out, the last thing I wanna point out, is that this treatment that I've given is not meant to be mathematically rigorous by any stretch of the imagination.