You already had kind of a sense of what an average is.

All right.

Anyway, I thought you would find that useful and, a final time, thanks to Kortaggio for sending that problem.

Same for mid air. Multiply 3 up to 6.

Did you do the last problem of the homework?

Did you do the last problem of the homework?

Is that supervised, unsupervised or reinforcement learning?

She is herself the very soul of delicacy. A shadow of a doubt as to my conduct would bring the matter to an end.

This fits very well.

Let's see.

9 0 7.

A shadow of a doubt as to my conduct would bring the matter to an end.

Tommy couldn't answer the last question.

one last question.

It's just that the last time Mark had a problem...

Congratulations for doing this. So this is the last, and final, class.

Well, here are the curves for it.

Maybe it's the diarrhea.

We maximized the posterior probability of data logarithmic is a monotonic function, and I put a minus sign over here so the optimization problem becomes a minimization problem.

Let's get started with some problems.

But it makes a whole lot of sense at some deep level.

That's pretty much it.

I found a problem, a specific problem that actually found an error with that.

(Applause)

Thank you. Thank you, too.

This is a very powerful technique.

Suppose I observe that I'm happy on day 1.

Thus, solving the problem once and for all.

Yes, but I think Europe has got a position, which is 27 countries have already come together.

There are only two elements of the return list July August and 1842.

So 7 times 11 is 77, and then 12 divided by 3 is 4.

Sport costs money.

A and B are d separated. Therefore, they are actually independent.

F over x is 40 times uppercase X of 2 mm is 80 meters.

Holy sh t!

(Laughter)

That isn't one of them, for me, but there's many others.

The public don't want it.

There's many possibilities.

Just let's think about that for a moment.

Maybe this is something unique about diarrhea.

And in the next video

It is no, no, no, and yes.

Nonetheless, that's how it was presented, and at trial nobody even argued it.

Now, what kinds of questions can we ask to do inference about?