General framework

REC 4 1800 Brochure EN 23 08 04 9 18 Page 9

Use this as a template but don't think that there's anything magic about this.

I can't ask you for more.

So these are three things you can do to increase your imagination, right?

So people who believed in psychological solutions didn't have a model.

This is probably a better picture.

Depending on the context, depending on the outcome, choose your paradigm.

(Laughter) (Applause)

First, what do good arguers win when they win an argument?

You'll start to recognize these things from what we've collected before.

And it could set the stage for global action.

You can't deal with the economic and financial problem.

Chileans have been building with confined masonry for decades.

We were having negative per capita growth.

And Hosain Rahman, the CEO of Aliph Jawbone, you know, really understands that you need a different structure.

That's pretty good.

But anyway, that's not the topic of discussion.

There are indeed very important shifts in global power.

And it's super simple, but they still have kind of amazing guarantees.

That's in the language of the grammar, so I desperately hope that our procedure is going to find that out.

This idea has a lot of traction with us.

The truth is a bit more nuanced.

It's a wonderful way to look at these questions, when you write a story.

I believe we could.

Because we have no way to agree about where to set the knobs.

Everything else is mandated.

We're working with the folks at IBM Research from the Accessibility Center to string together technologies to work towards the universal translator.

Actually there's more fundamental observation.

(Laughter) (Applause)

You can't deal with the environmental problem through existing institutions.

So, no matter what he did, it was always zero.

When you have scientist speaking about theory, they're talking about the framework that is consistent with all earlier observation and predicts lots and lots of future observations and its actually the best framework in most cases

The way at the bottom is a confined masonry building, where the walls are tied together, the building is symmetric, and it will stand up to an earthquake.

It created the framework for a cross section of communities to come together and created the infrastructure to turn vision into action.

It's quite subtle, but I think it gives you nice frame work for what probability is.

If you don't have that drive and that motivation, you are not going to connect and combine ideas.

If the different frames of reference don't come together in about .5 seconds, it's not funny, but I think they will for you here.

Seismic standards and confined masonry, where the building acts as a whole walls and columns and roofs and slabs tied together to support each other instead of breaking off into separate members and failing.

Show only frames of graphics

And that's typically the paradigm under which we've operated.

And this is a problem for which we need to scale this technology, and we need to scale it now.

In analyzing societal collapses, I've arrived at a five point framework a checklist of things that I go through to try and understand collapses.

17.Regulatory framework and criteria fortest development and use

So hopefully that gives you a little bit of framework next time you watch basketball game and you can pause your TiVo and figure out the probability when the person is making that last clutch shot.