Router malfunction in hard drive 3.

I am quite content not being the leading lady

In the end, it's us programmers who are actually introducing these bugs in there and so are very much prefer the term defect.

But it's flawed.

But I'm glad to say that I think we know the cause of all these conditions, and that cause is NDD

We want to make sure that the defect is actually error, that is it is wrong.

With your faults

Like a mistake?

Why?

Remember Prickly Pear.

To correct the defect, such that it no longer produces an infection but actually makes the program behave correctly.

Doctor, I find one flaw in your theory.

And the first story is called

Well first and foremost, this is a defect because if a statement produces an infection then it must be erroneous itself, and an error in the code is what we normally call a defect.

Now, Biff, I never noticed that the car had any blind spot before when I would drive it.

They're brand new technology. Databases are really hard.

They can be.

What's my flaw ? Your temper.

First, we have the ball then we have the window crashing forward.

As I say, it sounded good. But when we came to go into the thing, we saw that there was a flaw.

So all we need in this situation is to look at the governing condition, and lo and behold, we do have a defect.

Computers are obedient to a fault.

This one... is a bit... defective.

Next example.

So, we're sitting around and thinking,

Vosk's time travel device had a drawback.

Her timing was fatally flawed.

Simple point the old civilization is no longer sustainable.

Apparently there was some sort of banana in the transmission.

Now, however, since in the beginning, we have a normal input and in the end we have a failure, there must be a defect somewhere in our program that actually causes the problem.

So, we put tumors and now we have over 100 tumors on our array.

Before you fix the defect, you should be sure that the defect actually is the defect.

Are you blind, McFly? How else do you explain that wreck out there?

You running a glitch in the program or something?

And here is the crucial thing.

It's... a genetic defect of some kind.

We process you for a whole year.

Rid the new system of its imperfection!

This notion of causality is important in debugging because when you fix a defect we want to make sure to think first.

And I remember saying on the morning of the accident,

Fuzz testing is a technique where you generate random inputs for a program or an APl.

This system has obvious defects.

Errors are typically unwanted and unintended. Failures are error. A defect is also an error.

Well, I guess it's not going to do the navy much good if it doesn't work.

Second, the more active assertions there are, the easier it is for you to find the defect.