Hal, I won't argue with you any more.

We're not going to have this argument again.

And he used to be the USA Today Monday morning guy.

Now as you know, a great deal of time is spent, in this country and around the world, inside the climate debate, on the question of, What if the IPC scientists are all wrong?

So I'm going to demonstrate that through discussion of some of the climate change things that are going on in the ocean.

Can't argue with that.

So government needs to make us do something painful to fix it.

listen to at least three radio stations a day.

Political candidates should talk about family values.

And it turned out that Joel and I were both bothered by the same thing, which was how so much of the debate was still focused on the science and how complete it was or wasn't, which, to both of us, seems somewhat intentionally off point.

You're such a debater, M. Pierre.

Define controversial.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

I've heard that argument before.

The climate of England is milder than of Scotland.

The climate of England is similar to that of Hokkaido.

The climate of Japan is not like that of England.

Can you imagine yourself watching yourself argue,

I think we want the lot of humanity to keep on increasing.

We're getting a lot of interest from government.

The climate here is milder than that of England.

The climate here is milder than that of England.

The climate of England is milder than that of Scotland.

The climate of Japan is milder than that of England.

The climate here is like that of Hokkaido.

The climate of Florida in the wintertime is milder than that of Iowa.

The climate of Kochi is warmer than that of Kyoto.

And the tools are highly inaudible so unlike that, that statement that was done before.

For the sake of argument, let's say that

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

I had him in that discussion.

Or did you get close to what we came up with here?

His argument is more radical than yours.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

Discussion of licensing issues

Discussing look'n'feel issues

Can you do that?

You can't help but think that.

Will, that was a bit much.

E. O. F.

Then the discussion is over

Newspapermen are still downstairs.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

She argues for the sake of arguing.

She argues just for the sake of arguing.