A second terminology for environments pertains to whether the environment is deterministic or stochastic.

Now, in this version, there are no sensors and so no percepts.

Here's a game that we've seen before.

The first question is from Incu in New York.

You really don't want to wait for the truck to disappear.

There must be a finite number of actions to chose from.

Finally.

Here is an MDP question.

I wish to know whether it is stochastic.

You accumulate knowledge throughout your life in memories.

Games with dice, for example, like backgammon, are stochastic.

Critical.

Now what is the act observe cycle do to the sizes of the belief states?

We have to find a conclusive test.

You might remember in the very first class we distinguished very different characteristics of agent tasks, and here are some of those.

Random processes are said to be nondeterministic, since they're impossible to determine in advance.

So here are the 4 concepts again partially observable versus fully, stochastic versus deterministic, continuous versus discrete, adversarial versus benign.

My father's a little different.

The evidence is conclusive.

Seems the logical assumption.

We've certainly used logic all over the place in this class.

The judge reasoned it out.

Watch the hallway. What I did get isn't much.

George asked, While it's possible to constantly re plan if enough computational power is available,

This decision is final.

But it doesn't.

I am connected to everything and everyone. I was born like that.

It was big news, but this... this is better.

Take the action of going north from the from the cell over here.

So, we have 97, 94, 91, 88, 85 and so on.

So suppose we had a grid cell, and we attempt to go north.

So this debate will go on and on.

And finally, he revealed the truth of the matter.

I took care of in that HlV clinic.

And this comes from 0 as well.

Find a better way, my love.

Multithread programs may non deterministically switch between threads.

C1, the figure down here, after we ran value iteration over and over again all the way to a convergence.

If you don't provide for them, the technology may work, but the crew won't.

Narrator We've been considering sensor less planning in a deterministic world.

But technology alone isn't enough.

There is no uncertainty in action outcome, and there is no failure.

That will produce a legitimate and accountable government.

Wouldn't it be awesome if we all had BLlS on our phones?

We can call it the engineering approach, and I claim that the engineering approach is within range.