When they got better tape measures, they measured hey, my diameter's definitely 1.

That's just random noise. No, that's just the computer calibrating the signal to noise ratio.

Pressure

Measure

No Accounting

Repeat this automatic sequence for each tool that needs to be updated

Measurement tool for Impulse Responses

Measurements counts

Volume accounting

That's not so. You surmise incorrectly.

What would you like to measure? What would you like to analyze?

Measurement of an amount of matter.

Readouts are as follows

Crystal structure determination

A monitor calibration tool

The approximate diameter, it's a three inch (3 ) shell mill

Readouts are as follows...

Weather Station Configuration

So each of these sections are in degrees so we're measuring in degrees, but I want to be clear degrees aren't the only way to measure angles.

An amount with which the precision of a measurement can be estimated.

Uncertainty comes because of noisy observation.

You make two assumptions, Ms. Dunham, both incorrect.

Please give the index of the features over here that clearly have to be 1, 2, and 3 in some order which you have to determine.

Tag Guesser Configuration

But why?

Triangulate his position.

Use my results as a baseline.

I gotta go work on the scanner...

The font size in pixels.

The color for the angular distance measurement ruler.

Make a time measurement to check performance

It's like this I drew it smaller.

Show the computations that lead to your answer.

We built engines so we built 100 different engines over the last two years.

Now notice, when we measured just the amount of fencing we needed, we ended up just with meters, just with kind of a one dimensional measurement.

So the physics is you can never accurately and exactly measure a particle, because the observation changes it.

That's because we're not measuring square meters here.

I work as a theoretical physicist.

It's a portable bonedensity scanner.

Biometrics showed normal.

It's used to locate objects in the space that have these reflective markers on them.

What it is that we have to know about the target or the drug to be able to understand the interaction between the two?

And you do that by measuring the relative activation of the left prefrontal cortex in the fMRl, versus the right prefrontal cortex.

So this makes quantifying silk properties by methods such as tensile testing, which is basically, you know, tugging on one end of the fiber, very amenable.

What I want to do in this video is to talk a little bit about spectrophotometry.