This is their baseline.

Any real proof?

And the challenge is really found in this picture here.

This is scientific evidence from wellknown researchers forced to work in secret.

And the obsession can get worse when you've been rejected.

Is that scientifically proven?

Has that been scientifically proven?

Evidence for Large Decadal Variability in the Tropical Mean Radiative Energy Budget.

But of course, the drama is, it clearly shows that incremental change is not an option.

There is no scientific basis for these claims.

Many cases were reviewed.

That's not true at all.

I'd say it is. I told you that yesterday.

And it's not just because of regulation it's because of the amount of money needed under the current evidence based medicine and the size of trials and so on to make it happen.

There's no evidence it ever existed.

And they will contest this because the evidence presented in an earlier mode is not in the way they would like the evidence presented.

The evidence is conclusive.

sciencey?

We call that stuff dark matter.

look, I'm a night clerk, okay?

This is the truth, about death, the truth discovered by science, until now.

We do this, of course, with matters of race, and politics, and everything else, and we do it in science as well.

And the message I want to leave you with is, consciousness has to become accepted as a genuine biological phenomenon, as much subject to scientific analysis as any other phenomenon in biology, or, for that matter, the rest of science.

It turns outif you look at the available scientific evidence on the internet

But it doesn't.

So basically, the idea of being able to build things bottom up, atom by atom, has made them all into tinkerers.

Number one, show me documentation. It doesn't exist.

Right now, they don't even know this phone exists.

We investigate claims of the paranormal, pseudo science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between, science and pseudo science and non science and junk science, voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non science, and plain old non sense.

It sounds arrogant to say that most people are smarter than the average person.

We're here to catalog the chemical evidence.

The only real proof that the secret world exists.

Have you got any physical proof?

Why not just send another soldier after us?

Tell. So our cases have crossed.

Or maybe because I am a forensic scientist, and I could boil you from the inside out and never leave a trace.

In the face of innumerable insults to its character and its future prospect.

Maybe there's some studies, some longitudinal studies, that cost lots of money and took lots of time.

look at this situation and say, Well, there's nothing for the Dalai Lama to be really right about really right about or for Ted Bundy to be really wrong about that admits of a real argument that potentially falls within the purview of science.

I want to make a case.

The evidence is very clear that plants promote health.

How would I know what I was doing differently?

Uh... current students?

Proof?

I will need proof.