I'm all worn out

Like all machines, it wears out.

Whenever our shoes are worn out,

As the saying goes, a worn spear cannot even penetrate a thin cloth

ROMEO Why, then is my pump well flowered.

Modulus

The cells become damaged or just worn out

And that's true of any sample statistic.

Correlation

Extinction

Cooling factor

So I can just rewrite that as A so now A is not a function anymore, it's just a number A times the second derivative of y, with respect to x, plus B times the first derivative, plus C times y.

AMS Binomial Expression

Scale by factor

n Choose m

Next I want to focus for a little while on the notion of a clustering coefficient.

Laser power draining!

This is supposed to be a constant

So there's a fair amount of interconnection between a node's neighbors.

So just getting it correct to a couple of digits is probably sufficient.

2nd derivative r squared.

Now it's about eighteen.

Batteries must be running down.

Normal Binomial

Displaystyle Binomial

Textstyle Binomial

So we'd like to have a way of getting a pretty good answer in time a lot less than this.

We'll come back to that again in multiple regression, and in lecture nine in R. And then, the importance of this distinction between unstandardi zed and standardized regression coefficients.

How strong is the relationship?

But again, now that we're in multiple regression, this is not the same as the correlation coefficient.

I brushed.

Just it doesn't burn.

They're on the same side of the equation.

So let's multiply both sides by negative 3, right?

There'll be nothing left of that if you keep rubbing it.

Let's just solve x squared minus x minus thirty is equal to zero.

I think you see what I did.

So, I just said and look, the a is just the coefficient on the x term, right? a is the coefficient on the x squared term. b is the coefficient on the x term, and c is the constant.

Should have brushed, pal.

Emil, did you brush your teeth?

Hey, Nick, did you brush your teeth?

WINSTEAD

Goddamn it, I'm brushing my teeth.

Desperate for a solution, we've turned to engineering to design artificial components to replace our worn out body parts, but in the midst of the modern buzz around the promises of a bionic body, shouldn't we stop and ask if there's a better, more natural way?

You literally just look at this coefficient right here, and you say, OK, well what's half of that coefficient?