Descartes said we need an entire new way of thinking.

Okay, you need to cut out all your loser crybaby crap right now and think of something scientific.

Wow, wow!

replied in true scientific fashion...

We change what you think about the sciences and then...

His methods are not scientific.

Vaccines, modern medicine, our ability to feed billions of people, those are triumphs of the scientific method.

sciencey?

But the trouble with the philosophers is that they were philosophizing when they should have been science ophizing.

In the way that you would not if you dealt with standardized

Science is not a thing. It's a verb.

Devices like the cymascope, which you can see here, have been used to scientifically observe cymatic patterns.

From a strictly scientific point of view, history cannot be called a science.

And goods like this, we call them inferior goods.

And the basic paradigm we want to suggest to you,

Gaston, you are positively primeval.

You get you get, like

This can't possibly be scientific.

We investigate claims of the paranormal, pseudo science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between, science and pseudo science and non science and junk science, voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non science, and plain old non sense.

Can we be a little bit more formal and mathematical to show why it is that what this is computing is the product of a and b?

But, how exactly does this happen?

Why should you take this class and learn all about computing?

This isn't very scientific.

(Laughter)

You know, scientists and science is not creative.

Science is not defined by the method section of a paper.

Observation is a passive science, experimentation an active science.

It's a process, and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't, but the idea that we should not allow science to do its job because we're afraid, is really very deadening, and it's preventing millions of people from prospering.

This was due to a fundamental difference in our ideas about choice.

Now, are we done? Have we written what we have here in scientific notation?

let's remember what it means to be in scientific notation.

Something Something scientific, right. What?

I would choose the right one because it's less variable.

That's the humanitarian mission.

What?

Science is the way to prepare for the 21st century.

They don't even employ the people who review the papers.

It's not even science. Have you done this before?

The ancient Greeks were the first to think more or less scientifically about what light is and how vision works.

And as a consequence, people chose it.

Naturally, it would follow that you meet kind with kind.

So basically, the idea of being able to build things bottom up, atom by atom, has made them all into tinkerers.

But this is not quite official scientific notation.

Nye Now, um, space walks, launching Japanese modules, making scientific discoveries, that's routine.

And this is, obviously, not less than 10.